Go back
This why Trump should have won

This why Trump should have won

Debates

2 edits

According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Sorry, guys. He should have won. I don't like him much myself, but it is not a personality contest.

Which of Miachado or Trump constributed most to 1) fraternity BETWEEN NATIONS, 2, abolition and reduction of armies, 3) peace congresses? Three categories.
This is a her or him question. You Will Not Answer It.

Pitiful


@AverageJoe1 said
According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Sorry, guys. He should have won. I don't like him much myself, but it is not a personality contest.

Whic ...[text shortened]... gresses? Three categories.
This is a her or him question. You Will Not Answer It.

Pitiful
Its obvious you dont like him much.


@Rajk999 said
Its obvious you dont like him much.
You did not answer it. A simple him or her answer. Pitiful. If you say 'her', get into the 3 categories, citing how she prevailed!!


@AverageJoe1 said
You did not answer it. A simple him or her answer. Pitiful. If you say 'her', get into the 3 categories, citing how she prevailed!!
Do you really think I care who got the F...king Nobel Peace Prize?


@AverageJoe1 said
According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Sorry, guys. He should have won. I don't like him much myself, but it is not a personality contest.

Whic ...[text shortened]... gresses? Three categories.
This is a her or him question. You Will Not Answer It.

Pitiful
Trump bombed Iran and is waging a proxy war against Venezuela, blowing up ships on the high seas.

Explain to me how that advances " fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies".


@Rajk999 said
Do you really think I care who got the F...king Nobel Peace Prize?
The question was not asked of you specifically. And my response is natural amazement that one of the world-of-askees does not answer, but evades the question.
Perfectly reasonable, I am just enjoying the afternoon.


@AverageJoe1 said
The question was not asked of you specifically. And my response is natural amazement that one of the world-of-askees does not answer, but evades the question.
Perfectly reasonable, I am just enjoying the afternoon.
Let me help you out here. Nobody cares about your obsession with Trump.


@no1marauder said
Trump bombed Iran and is waging a proxy war against Venezuela, blowing up ships on the high seas.

Explain to me how that advances " fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies".
That which he did made a lot of nations happy. The answer is in your comment.
The bombing ABOLISHED a threatening nuclear facility and in the process, reduced the 'standing army' of Iran.

Is that you Marauder? Don't you like nuthin' ?


I am 'jiust looking at my afore-sited paragraph. The words abolish and reduce stuff. Did she? What?


@Rajk999 said
Let me help you out here. Nobody cares about your obsession with Trump.
My obsession with Trump is not an issue, is it. It is not an OP, you see. OP is about a person who has won the prize when another person has qulaified more under the wishes of Mr. Nobel.
My post is quite objective, read it again?


@AverageJoe1 said
That which he did made a lot of nations happy. The answer is in your comment.
The bombing ABOLISHED a threatening nuclear facility and in the process, reduced the 'standing army' of Iran.

Is that you Marauder? Don't you like nuthin' ?


I am 'jiust looking at my afore-sited paragraph. The words abolish and reduce stuff. Did she? What?
It's a "Peace" prize, not a "he started a war I like" prize.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
My obsession with Trump is not an issue, is it. It is not an OP, you see. OP is about a person who has won the prize when another person has qulaified more under the wishes of Mr. Nobel.
My post is quite objective, read it again?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/02/trump-defense-budget-hits-1-trillion-despite-doge/84419890007/

"the Pentagon formally announced the country's first-ever $1 trillion defense budget proposal for fiscal year 2026, eclipsing the previous year's enacted total by more than $100 billion."


Not exactly "reducing the standing army" is he?

In fact, he's busy siccing parts of the "standing army" against his own People. Doubt Alfred would have thought much of that.


@no1marauder said
It's a "Peace" prize, not a "he started a war I like" prize.
I'm sorry???? Did Alfred leave something out of this? And do you think for a second that he would not be ecstatic to present the prize to Trump?


According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."
Tell us what Trump did not 'do enough of' to deserve the Prize. Did he miss a war, darn it?
You imply Trump started a war? You mean syria fter wimpy Obama's red line? Whew.


@AverageJoe1 said
I'm sorry???? Did Alfred leave something out of this? And do you think for a second that he would not be ecstatic to present the prize to Trump?


According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded to those who have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the hold ...[text shortened]... war, darn it?
You imply Trump started a war? You mean syria fter wimpy Obama's red line? Whew.
I just told you, idiot. He helped Netanyahu's war on Iran, kept sending weapons to Israel to help its hyperviolent campaign against Gaza, is violating international and US law by attacking ships on the high seas, wants the US to spend more on the military than it ever has in its history and is sending troops against his own People because they are protesting his foolish policies toooooooooooooooo much.

What about any of that shows any commitment to the ideals Nobel specified for his Peace Prize?


@no1marauder said
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/02/trump-defense-budget-hits-1-trillion-despite-doge/84419890007/

"the Pentagon formally announced the country's first-ever $1 trillion defense budget proposal for fiscal year 2026, eclipsing the previous year's enacted total by more than $100 billion."


Not exactly "reducing the standing army" is he?

In fact, ...[text shortened]... g parts of the "standing army" against his own People. Doubt Alfred would have thought much of that.
"...the abolition or reduction of standing armies..." This does NOT refer to our own USA armies. YOu will agree? So, it must stand for armies of other nations....certainly you would agree with that.

So see here, your post of one link and three paras, you are whining to me that 'trump is not exactly reducing (our) standing army. '
He reduced THEIR STANDING ARMIES, which Mr Nobel made foremost.

So revisit my thread here, and try giving a genuous coherent post, setting your ire about Trump personality aside. It ain't in you to admit this mistake, and it SURE ain't in you to admit that I am right.


@AverageJoe1 said
"...the abolition or reduction of standing armies..." This does NOT refer to our own USA armies. YOu will agree? So, it must stand for armies of other nations....certainly you would agree with that.

So see here, your post of one link and three paras, you are whining to me that 'trump is not exactly reducing (our) standing army. '
He reduced THEIR STANDING ARMIES, ...[text shortened]... ty aside. It ain't in you to admit this mistake, and it SURE ain't in you to admit that I am right.
No, I don't agree; Nobel didn't put any limiting language in his will. So you putting it in there for him is BS.