Go back
This…

This…

Debates


@suzianne said
You are so freaking white that people have to wear sunglasses to talk to you.
you are so black it probably rubs off, do you use plenty of perfume?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
you are so black it probably rubs off, do you use plenty of perfume?
Do you think blacks need to use perfume?

Why is that?


@suzianne said
I have success, happiness and fulfillment.

How come you're having such a problem with these things? Maybe money just stands in the way of that? Try just being a human for once.
That can be assumed because libs are always screeching at conservatives for having and doing what they want with their stuff. In other words, you bother the hell out of people about their existence, the way they exist. Do conservatives start up this stuff every morning like you people do? A conservative keeps his eye out for libs carrying some sign about something that they 'want'. The want is usually something from someone else. Conservatives, well, we just dont do that. I did not say specifically who is happy or succesfull...I am saying it likely is that way , as y'all keep coming at people and trying to tax the hell out of them to get money to run your liberal programs, which are mostly unconstitutional anyway, but I already went over that.

If we attend a town hall meeting and we all agree that no one in the town will bother anyone else, who do you think will be the first person to knock on someone else's door? A liberal, no question.


@mott-the-hoople said
Im waiting on you to explain how bernie and biden got to be multimillionaires working for the govt...ne education required
Aint gonna happen

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
That can be assumed because libs are always screeching at conservatives for having and doing what they want with their stuff. In other words, you bother the hell out of people about their existence, the way they exist. Do conservatives start up this stuff every morning like you people do? A conservative keeps his eye out for libs carrying some sign about something tha ...[text shortened]... , who do you think will be the first person to knock on someone else's door? A liberal, no question.
Securing the rights of the People is what the Constitution is for. Not for taking them away, like you people want to do.

That you disagree so vehemently is really too bad.

Just pay your freaking taxes, like everyone else. And wear a damn mask.


@suzianne said
We're transitioning to a better world for our children.

If only people like McConnell would get out of the way.

And that is what has you so damned scared.

Equality must give you nightmares.
It gives me nightmares, mainly because it is impossible, and tiresome. You can write about it, or. or, or, you can get off your duff and out-equal the next guy. Have you people truly got no roll-up-your-sleeves Americanism? No drive to prosper? I just do not understand it, your posts are full of it between the lines.

I still have yet to read a lib post with the words freedom, liberty, or independence.

And to children raising, you do it your way, I will do it mine. Let's see how it works out.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Securing the rights of the People is what the Constitution is for. Not for taking them away, like you people want to do.

That you disagree so vehemently is really too bad.

Just pay your freaking taxes, like everyone else. And wear a damn mask.
Funny you think you know the Constitution. If you did, you would not paint yourself into a corner with every post. It would be interesting, though, for you to tell us just what rights of the people the 'Constitution is for". Please specify where in the Constitution each right is enumerated.
Be caaaaarrrrful......this is a trick question, you will find yourself painted into a corner.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
You are so freaking white that people have to wear sunglasses to talk to you.
May I ask if you are a "white" person ashamed of your "whiteness"?

I am just myself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Do you know that there are 17 enumerated powers in the Constitution? The federal govt is only allowed to operate in the scope of the enumerated powers. If it is not in the powers, the 10th amendment calls for whatever power is desired to be held by the states So ,if it is not there, the govt can not do the things that liberals want to get done. Article 1, sec 8 defi ...[text shortened]... u simply cannot do the stuff you want to do. Just what do you want a 'benevolent ' President to do?
Thank you for this reminder. We should also consider that the framers of the Constitution already knew "what people are like" while they worked to refine that document.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Do you think blacks need to use perfume?

Why is that?
Wait -- are you Black?

Because you sure do write White. 😉


@averagejoe1 said
Do you know that there are 17 enumerated powers in the Constitution? The federal govt is only allowed to operate in the scope of the enumerated powers. If it is not in the powers, the 10th amendment calls for whatever power is desired to be held by the states So ,if it is not there, the govt can not do the things that liberals want to get done. Article 1, sec 8 defi ...[text shortened]... u simply cannot do the stuff you want to do. Just what do you want a 'benevolent ' President to do?
AJ: Article 1, sec 8 defines what the congress is allowed to write tax law for.

Yes it does:

"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States"

So IF in Congress' wisdom they decide any program helps provide for the "general welfare of the United States" they can allocate tax money for it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Do you think blacks need to use perfume?

Why is that?
why does ANYONE use perfume?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
AJ: Article 1, sec 8 defines what the congress is allowed to write tax law for.

Yes it does:

"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States"

So IF in Congress' wisdom they decide any program helps provide for the "general welfare of the United States" they can allocate tax money for it.
Again, you think that 'the general welfare' is defined as that 'welfare' which is sucked up by today's entitlement programs. NO, I must disagree. If for no other reason, these 39 delegates who signed the Constitution (I think that is the number) hardly were thinking about feeding people. I'm sorry, Marauder. People in those days were independent (don't you just hate it) ,they enjoyed freedom and liberty for the First time IN there LIVES, and thought not about having the government support them. So, you can apply today's welfare to that phrase in the constitution , but AvJoe is here to tell you that that aint what they meant. "We are going to feed and house and clothe everybody!!!"

Be honest for god sakes!