Originally posted by moon1969While I agree that those predictions were stupid, are you sure you want to tie the Dow to the President? If you do, then you can't complain the next time the Dow dips and someone blames the President.
What happened?
Record high. Thanks Mr. President.
The truth is that the President does not have that much control over the market; and the other truth is that a strong stock market is not always necessarily such a wonderful thing.
07 Mar 13
Originally posted by sh76Give moon a break. It's not often he gets any good news that he can attempt to forcefully tie to the President. 😠
While I agree that those predictions were stupid, are you sure you want to tie the Dow to the President? If you do, then you can't complain the next time the Dow dips and someone blames the President.
The truth is that the President does not have that much control over the market; and the other truth is that a strong stock market is not always necessarily such a wonderful thing.
Originally posted by sh76I generally agree with your reply but let me say this. I think that Presidents generally impact the economy less than most people think. Yet, in reality the President gets blame for any bad economic indicators, and thus should get credit for good economic indicators. Lastly, the so-called "ills" of having an increasing Dow are being blown out of proportion lately in part in an effort to minimize any resulting positive nuances that might be associated with the President. The recovery of the market has been great. A steady viable recovery to provide captial for investment and to restore our 401K's after the devastation caused by the Bush era.
While I agree that those predictions were stupid, are you sure you want to tie the Dow to the President? If you do, then you can't complain the next time the Dow dips and someone blames the President.
The truth is that the President does not have that much control over the market; and the other truth is that a strong stock market is not always necessarily such a wonderful thing.