Go back
trump appointed judge dismisses case against trump…

trump appointed judge dismisses case against trump…

Debates

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89744
Clock
149d

Yeah. That’s about as kosher as a bacon sandwich.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro

Banana repuplic, anyone? Haha

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@shavixmir said
Yeah. That’s about as kosher as a bacon sandwich.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro

Banana repuplic, anyone? Haha
My my, a llittle jab with 'Trump appointed'. This is a great case to support a re-vamping of the Constitution. Imagine,,,,,a president appointing a person to a judgeship!!!!! It should not be allowed. People like Shav and AOC, and those foreign members and muslims of 'the squad', and Sonhouse and Bernie should appoint judges.
Y'all lose Shav. Frankly, you have been asking for it. Here is a conflict. Y'all are all behind Bill Barr not liking Trump. But he just said that Trump is no dictator. Oh, the conflict.
Keep on a' postin!

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
149d

@shavixmir said
Yeah. That’s about as kosher as a bacon sandwich.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro

Banana repuplic, anyone? Haha
banana republic STOPPED in its tracks...

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147477
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1 said
My my, a llittle jab with 'Trump appointed'. This is a great case to support a re-vamping of the Constitution. Imagine,,,,,a president appointing a person to a judgeship!!!!! It should not be allowed. People like Shav and AOC, and those foreign members and muslims of 'the squad', and Sonhouse and Bernie should appoint judges.
Y'all lose Shav. Frankly, you ha ...[text shortened]... king Trump. But he just said that Trump is no dictator. Oh, the conflict.
Keep on a' postin!
shatmixer lost a long time before this

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89744
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1 said
My my, a llittle jab with 'Trump appointed'. This is a great case to support a re-vamping of the Constitution. Imagine,,,,,a president appointing a person to a judgeship!!!!! It should not be allowed. People like Shav and AOC, and those foreign members and muslims of 'the squad', and Sonhouse and Bernie should appoint judges.
Y'all lose Shav. Frankly, you ha ...[text shortened]... king Trump. But he just said that Trump is no dictator. Oh, the conflict.
Keep on a' postin!
What the fvck are you jibbering on about?

You can’t have person C appoint a fvcking judge and then let that judge judge a bloody case about person C.

That’s madness.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@shavixmir said
What the fvck are you jibbering on about?

You can’t have person C appoint a fvcking judge and then let that judge judge a bloody case about person C.

That’s madness.
Yes, we know that that is what you are saying in your post above, with 'Trump appointed'. We get that. So, my , my, what WILL we do about that pesky Constitution???

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1
Oh, you mean they should not appoint a judge who is obviously biased in Trump's favor? Did you really think she came to that conclusion based on EVIDENCE? She has her lips firmly attached to Trump's ass and that case is a job reference to be appointed to SCOTUS.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Oh, you mean they should not appoint a judge who is obviously biased in Trump's favor? Did you really think she came to that conclusion based on EVIDENCE? She has her lips firmly attached to Trump's ass and that case is a job reference to be appointed to SCOTUS.
I don't MEAN anything. All I said was that you may have YOUR case for changing the constitution.
Man, do you have a problem with comprehension!!!!!!!!! And what does that sentence just above mean?
You write like Sonhouse.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1
This has nothing to do with the constitution. ZERO, it has 100% to due with getting totally biased judges in office in this case to personally benefit your would be dictator and her decision CLEARLY is a job reference to the possibility of a life time gig on SCOTUS, but THAT clearly goes above your limited intelligence to comprehend, just like your limited comprehension of reading material.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
This has nothing to do with the constitution. ZERO, it has 100% to due with getting totally biased judges in office in this case to personally benefit your would be dictator and her decision CLEARLY is a job reference to the possibility of a life time gig on SCOTUS, but THAT clearly goes above your limited intelligence to comprehend, just like your limited comprehension of reading material.
Oh. Nothing to do with the Constitution. I am left speechless.

Hey, did the Senate approve the appointment of Jack Smith.? Just a little housekeeping to shore up your post.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
149d
2 edits

@shavixmir said
Yeah. That’s about as kosher as a bacon sandwich.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro

Banana repuplic, anyone? Haha
Great news. Joe's box of classified docs in his garage can be dismissed as well.

Maybe we can finally put "bu bu but Hunter's laptop" to bed now too. Obviously, President's children and inlaws have immunity (viz Jared Kushner getting paid 2 billion by the Saudis for unknown 'services rendered' ).

And Hillary's emails .. obviously a Secty. of State can do whatever she wants with her emails.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1
Well tell us oh maven of all things politic, just who did Smith suck up to to give up his last job prosecuting war criminals, I guess that was just too boring for Smith who has obvious mental deficiencies, right?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@moonbus said
Great news. Joe's box of classified docs in his garage can be dismissed as well.

Maybe we can finally put "bu bu but Hunter's laptop" to bed now too. Obviously, President's children and inlaws have immunity (viz Jared Kushner getting paid 2 billion by the Saudis for unknown 'services rendered' ).

And Hillary's emails .. obviously a Secty. of State can do whatever she wants with her emails.
This silly fella, without citing anything, just says 'he thinks' that the documents case carries the same weight as the chicanery of the Biden family evidenced by the Laptop, the millions and millions, their SILENCE about the source and pupose of the milliions and millions, and the lies of Joe exposed.
Follow Moonbus, the guy is unbelievable with his opinions. Ask him when cancer will be cured. And can he cite some souirces?

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
149d

@AverageJoe1 said
This silly fella, without citing anything, just says 'he thinks' that the documents case carries the same weight as the chicanery of the Biden family evidenced by the Laptop, the millions and millions, their SILENCE about the source and pupose of the milliions and millions, and the lies of Joe exposed.
Follow Moonbus, the guy is unbelievable with his opinions. Ask him when cancer will be cured. And can he cite some souirces?
The courts have created monster they won't be able to control, and you won't like it when you see the monster does.

I blame Mitch McConnell; Mitch knew Trump was a loose cannon and could have stopped all this by conforming the first impeachment. But Mitch was a coward.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
149d

@moonbus said
The courts have created monster they won't be able to control, and you won't like it when you see the monster does.

I blame Mitch McConnell; Mitch knew Trump was a loose cannon and could have stopped all this by conforming the first impeachment. But Mitch was a coward.
I would say without a doubt that the courts cannot control Joe Biden, either, nor his puppet master Jill, for that matter. Did you see where the TOP court told him he had no power to do the tuition thingy? But he said that they would not stop him? He said 'they will not stop me'. SO, he is out of control.
Can you write a coherent response to this, or are you going to just let ole AvJoe win another???

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.