Judge Engeron has just fined Trump over 350 million for inflating the value of his RE holdings to get loans he didn't deserve, then deflating these same RE holdings in order to pay less tax. This on top of the 83 million for the E Jean Carroll sexual assault / defamation case. (Transcript below)
It seems our "stable genius" is nothing more than a white-collar thief.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/16/politics/read-ruling-donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-new-york/index.html
302d
@mchill saidHe can afford it because mara Lago is worth eleventy billion dollars.
Judge Engeron has just fined Trump 364 million for inflating the value of his RE holdings to get loans he didn't deserve, then deflating these same RE holdings in order to pay less tax. This on top of the 83 million for the E Jean Carroll sexual assault / defamation case. (Transcript below)
It seems our "stable genius" is nothing more than a white-collar thief.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/16/politics/read-ruling-donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-new-york/index.html
@djj saidAre the libs going to put stock in the decision of this judge? He does not like Trump. The prosecutor promised when she was campaigning that she was going to get Donald Trump. Even before all of the facts came out that were brought to the floor in this biased judges courtroom. So the prosecutor and the judge are not quite copacetic. Y’all rave on about this judgment, I am not interested, but I will be interested when it is overturned, which of course will happen way after he becomes president.
@mchill
Another case that will fall apart. Such obvious bias, the judge found him liable before the trial even started. You lefties are so hard for any sort of win you grasp at rubbish. Clowns.
302d
@averagejoe1 saidI am not interested
Are the libs going to put stock in the decision of this judge? He does not like Trump. The prosecutor promised when she was campaigning that she was going to get Donald Trump. Even before all of the facts came out that were brought to the floor in this biased judges courtroom. So the prosecutor and the judge are not quite copacetic. Y’all rave on about this judgment, I ...[text shortened]... ill be interested when it is overturned, which of course will happen way after he becomes president.
If you're not interested, then why are you posting a response?
302d
@mchill said“Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological,” Engoron wrote of Trump and his co-defendants.
Judge Engeron has just fined Trump over 350 million for inflating the value of his RE holdings to get loans he didn't deserve, then deflating these same RE holdings in order to pay less tax. This on top of the 83 million for the E Jean Carroll sexual assault / defamation case. (Transcript below)
It seems our "stable genius" is nothing more than a white-collar thief.
h ...[text shortened]... tps://www.cnn.com/2024/02/16/politics/read-ruling-donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-new-york/index.html
@mchill saidLook again, I am not interested in the ill-advised uneducated comments of people who were not in the courtroom, and cannot thus cannot render comments of any note. So, really, why would I listen to that? Do you understand property valuations? Well, the judge does not, did not, so, i would think you would not either. The valuations were a major element. So, I will not bother reading you and sonhouse about a case such as this.
I am not interested
If you're not interested, then why are you posting a response?
Like I said, not interested. Y'all have at it.
301d
@divegeester saidI look at it this way: If they vote him back in, they'll have the best president (hush) money can buy.
“It’s a witch-hunt!”
“It’s a sham!”
“The judges are deluded, biased and crooked”
God help America if you morons vote this malignant narcissistic criminal back into the White House 🤦♂️
301d
@averagejoe1 saidHey Joe, were you in the courtroom? Did you actually look over the contracts and the signed affidavits and the IRS tax forms with falsified data on them? No? Not interested in your comments either.
Look again, I am not interested in the ill-advised uneducated comments of people who were not in the courtroom, and cannot thus cannot render comments of any note. So, really, why would I listen to that? Do you understand property valuations? Well, the judge does not, did not, so, i would think you would not either. The valuations were a major element. So, I will not b ...[text shortened]... ading you and sonhouse about a case such as this.
Like I said, not interested. Y'all have at it.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
301d
@moonbus saidexperts in the financial business were in the court room…they said nothing unusual here. engoron said there testimony was faulty…he is the sole authority.
Hey Joe, were you in the courtroom? Did you actually look over the contracts and the signed affidavits and the IRS tax forms with falsified data on them? No? Not interested in your comments either.
you libs are a sorry lowlife lot