Debates
30 Mar 23
30 Mar 23
@averagejoe1 saidIt's the same thing democrat John Edwards did with his mistress a ways back. He didn't go to jail, just paid a big fine for campaign violations.
Using Police Power to arrest. It just feels really bad. A hush-money payment, unbelievable . A political persecution.
Go for it, libs. You will be sorry
It's fine. So much whining from conservatives. Back in the day, a political persecution involved ... a lot more pain. Wimps.
Back the blue.
30 Mar 23
@wildgrass saidRemember Gary Hart with his mistress topless on the boat Monkey Business? Blew him right out of the water
It's the same thing democrat John Edwards did with his mistress a ways back. He didn't go to jail, just paid a big fine for campaign violations.
It's fine. So much whining from conservatives. Back in the day, a political persecution involved ... a lot more pain. Wimps.
Back the blue.
@earl-of-trumps saidCorrect. Which is why that's not why he's being indicted.
It's not against the law for Trump to have sex with that woman, nor is it illegal for that woman to sign a NDA with Trump.
He's being investigated for both campaign finance violations *and* falsifying business records in order to cover up those violations. Two separate possible charges in one case.
Trump still has two other criminal investigations:
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/23/1164985436/trump-criminal-investigations
30 Mar 23
@earl-of-trumps saidWell that should clear it up. Go represent him in court. It's a home run, LOL
.
This is curious.
It's not against the law for Trump to have sex with that woman, nor is it illegal for that woman to sign a NDA with Trump.
Well, I guess I'll find out in due time. I think I'll put CNN on tonight and watch them do the macarena
31 Mar 23
@wildgrass saidSounds like you are good with this? Your country doing this? Like stalin, hitler, et al? Do you see a difference?
It's the same thing democrat John Edwards did with his mistress a ways back. He didn't go to jail, just paid a big fine for campaign violations.
It's fine. So much whining from conservatives. Back in the day, a political persecution involved ... a lot more pain. Wimps.
Back the blue.
31 Mar 23
@earl-of-trumps saidIt wasn't illegal for Bill to get sucked off by an adult woman but he got dragged through all kinds of crap for it
.
This is curious.
It's not against the law for Trump to have sex with that woman, nor is it illegal for that woman to sign a NDA with Trump.
Well, I guess I'll find out in due time. I think I'll put CNN on tonight and watch them do the macarena
31 Mar 23
@earl-of-trumps saidFor the record, sex between them has not been confirmed, Trump denies it. So, legally, what sex?
.
This is curious.
It's not against the law for Trump to have sex with that woman, nor is it illegal for that woman to sign a NDA with Trump.
Well, I guess I'll find out in due time. I think I'll put CNN on tonight and watch them do the macarena
31 Mar 23
@vivify saidI will be sickened with the comments of you people who wish him to go down. Sickening. You don't even know the charge yet. Sickening.
Correct. Which is why that's not why he's being indicted.
He's being investigated for both campaign finance violations *and* falsifying business records in order to cover up those violations. Two separate possible charges in one case.
Trump still has two other criminal investigations:
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/23/1164985436/trump-criminal-investigations
AvJoe.
31 Mar 23
@averagejoe1 saidAverage Joe: You don't even know the charge yet.
We all know the Appellate will throw it out, and certainly SCOTUS. So what is the reason y'all are doing this to him?
Average Joe the Second: We all know the Appellate will throw it out, and certainly SCOTUS.
What's wrong with this picture?
The indictment remains under seal, so all the Republicans claiming it is some meritless political prosecution (which is virtually all of them who have commented on it) are just empty heads blowing smoke to their easily deluded followers.
I prefer to wait and see what the charges are.
31 Mar 23
@averagejoe1 saidTo grind him down, and no other.
We all know the Appellate will throw it out, and certainly SCOTUS. So what is the reason y'all are doing this to him?
31 Mar 23
@averagejoe1 saidIt is indisputable that he paid a pornstar to be quiet.
For the record, sex between them has not been confirmed, Trump denies it. So, legally, what sex?
The legal dispute is whose money paid her.