@metal-brain saidWhat scenario?
I didn't question the quote. I question the possibility of her claim. If you can prove that scenario is possible I am all ears.
@kevcvs57 saidGood grief. Here is the link again.
What scenario?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/hillary-clinton-says-biden-should-not-concede-2020-election-under-n1238156
The title of the article is this:
"Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'"
It doesn't say under a specific circumstance. It says "under any circumstances". Is the title a false quote or is it accurate? Yes or no?
@metal-brain saidWhy are you being disingenuous it’s obvious that she’s talking about until it’s declared for one candidate or another as their will be a lot of confusion about the result due to republican shenanigans as directed by trump.
Good grief. Here is the link again.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/hillary-clinton-says-biden-should-not-concede-2020-election-under-n1238156
The title of the article is this:
"Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'"
It doesn't say under a specific circumstance. It says "under any circumstances". Is the title a false quote or is it accurate? Yes or no?
Obviously if the loser doesn’t concede it will be declared for him. Trump is vowing to not accept the outcome if it’s not in his favour regardless of the final count and declaration.
Again why are you pretending not to see this. It’s Trump right or wrong for you isn’t it MB.
@kevcvs57 saidNo, it is not obvious. Post a quote to prove she said what you claim or admit Hitlary told Biden to not accept the outcome before Trump was asked if he would the second time. I say second time because he gave the same answer 4 years ago.
Why are you being disingenuous it’s obvious that she’s talking about until it’s declared for one candidate or another as their will be a lot of confusion about the result due to republican shenanigans as directed by trump.
Obviously if the loser doesn’t concede it will be declared for him. Trump is vowing to not accept the outcome if it’s not in his favour regardless of the ...[text shortened]... ation.
Again why are you pretending not to see this. It’s Trump right or wrong for you isn’t it MB.
HRC suggested not accepting the outcome, not Trump. Trump was just answering a question the same way he did 4 years previously. His answer was predictable, which is why they asked it.
It worked. Even though it was HRC that suggested the whole idea you falsely think it was Trump merely because you heard it from him first because that is how the news media intended it.
HRC started the whole thing. She suggested it first to Biden. That is a fact.
@metal-brain saidHow is it possible (despite your protestations to the contrary) that you lose every single argument you have on this site?
No, it is not obvious. Post a quote to prove she said what you claim or admit Hitlary told Biden to not accept the outcome before Trump was asked if he would the second time. I say second time because he gave the same answer 4 years ago.
HRC suggested not accepting the outcome, not Trump. Trump was just answering a question the same way he did 4 years previously. His ...[text shortened]... media intended it.
HRC started the whole thing. She suggested it first to Biden. That is a fact.
You have no idea about most subjects you argue about. You argue from some bizarre, right-field take on every single subject.
Why do you get EVERY thing so wrong?
I'm thinking that on at least some of these, you must be simply taking the piss, because nobody gets every single subject wrong. The law of averages state that you should get lucky and be right at least once in a while, but I have never seen that happen.
Do you want to explain to us how you can possily take the wrong side on every single topic? Nobody is that stupid.
@suzianne saidhttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/communication-success/201707/6-common-traits-narcissists-and-gaslighters
How is it possible (despite your protestations to the contrary) that you lose every single argument you have on this site?
You have no idea about most subjects you argue about. You argue from some bizarre, right-field take on every single subject.
Why do you get EVERY thing so wrong?
I'm thinking that on at least some of these, you must be simply taking the piss, b ...[text shortened]... explain to us how you can possily take the wrong side on every single topic? Nobody is that stupid.