Go back
Trump to speak shortly...

Trump to speak shortly...

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down
-6

he is going to rip this corrupt bunch a new one!

Vote Up
Vote Down
-6

🙂

Vote Up
4
Vote Down
-1

Steady on you two I can almost smell the oestrogen

Vote Up
4
Vote Down
-1

@mott-the-hoople said
he is going to rip this corrupt bunch a new one!
He got saved from an indictment because his aides refused to carry out his order to fire Mueller.

Or as FOX Propaganda calls it....
A complete and total exoneration !! 😆

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@mghrn55 said
He got saved from an indictment because his aides refused to carry out his order to fire Mueller.

Or as FOX Propaganda calls it....
A complete and total exoneration !! 😆
nope! Trump had the authority to fire mueller.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
he is going to rip this corrupt bunch a new one!
Why would Trump rip himself anything?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@shallow-blue said
Why would Trump rip himself anything?
because he is not split from as shole to appetite like you are 😳😂

1 edit
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
nope! Trump had the authority to fire mueller.
Of course he did !!
But to stop an investigation into him is obstruction.
That Mueller decided not to proceed with an indictment, by a hair, does not constitute exoneration.

Looks like Jared and Donald Jr (Fredo) got off.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@mghrn55 said
Of course he did !!
But to stop an investigation into him is obstruction.
That Mueller decided not to proceed with an indictment, by a hair, does not constitute exoneration.

Looks like Jared and Donald Jr (Fredo) got off.
It's very doubtful whether firing Mueller could be called (criminal) obstruction.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@mghrn55 said
Of course he did !!
But to stop an investigation into him is obstruction.
That Mueller decided not to proceed with an indictment, by a hair, does not constitute exoneration.

Looks like Jared and Donald Jr (Fredo) got off.
not unless it is with corrupt intent. its a seperation of powers thing.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@sh76 said
It's very doubtful whether firing Mueller could be called (criminal) obstruction.
Anyone in Trump's position would have wanted to fire him, but he had restraint and did not.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

Why has no one asked this...

how do we know mueller is being truthful? Everyone is just taking this and running with it as if its been proven. Dont forget this report was compiled by mueller and 13 democrats, some of which worked for clinton.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@mott-the-hoople said
Why has no one asked this...

how do we know mueller is being truthful? Everyone is just taking this and running with it as if its been proven. Dont forget this report was compiled by mueller and 13 democrats, some of which worked for clinton.
I don't know why Mueller just did not make up a bunch of stuff about collusion.

Then you would have had at least half the country believing him no matter what.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2

@whodey said
I don't know why Mueller just did not make up a bunch of stuff about collusion.

Then you would have had at least half the country believing him no matter what.
hell, mueller said there was no collusion and some idiots still believe there was

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@mott-the-hoople said
Why has no one asked this...

how do we know mueller is being truthful? Everyone is just taking this and running with it as if its been proven. Dont forget this report was compiled by mueller and 13 democrats, some of which worked for clinton.
Remember Rosenstein was right there in the redacting........and He is the guy who said he might wear a wire to trap Trump, hates him. Yet, he reported the facts and did the redacting, which proves there is no way he and the 14 other officers/lawyers could spin it,,,,,,,,,,,,there simply is Nothing There. Trump haters are in denial, though, which gives rise to questions such as this.

Lordy, I wish the haters would stop it, let him get on with his policies, maybe get China and Korea, you know.