- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
@my-king-and-i removed their quoted postIf you are not feeling too shy, could you remind me what your username used to be?
1 edit
@Arkturos saidWhy in the world would I use this against you?
@Suzianne
Please don't use this against me in the future, but two or three decades ago at work I wore a green paper clover with a pink triangle, pinned to my shirt.
You have some sort of weird ideas about where I stand, despite me posting this article, and despite everything I've ever posted in this forum.
Must be the testosterone causing some guys to be reactionary against lesbians and some gay guys to be reactionary against women in general. And God forbid one be bisexual and get it from both sides. I have enough experience with men and gay men to know this is not a position that most hold. There are people who act with insufficient knowledge in any group.
Usually it's people on the right end of the political spectrum, so it irritates me to see these kinds of attitudes on the left as well.
1 edit
@moonbus saidYou'd think we, as a species, would have learned this the first time 'round.
@Suzianne
When people start disappearing into camps, it's already too late; they don't stop at Jews, communists, and queers--they come for Dick & Jane and Jack & Jill next.
Specific groups have traditionally acted as "the canary in the coalmine". One problem is whether people actually listen to these groups.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
2 edits
@Suzianne saidHow would you know what ideas I have? It's pretty much a vague blizzard of this and that in my head, usually.
Why in the world would I use this against you?
You have some sort of weird ideas about where I stand, despite me posting this article, and despite everything I've ever posted in this forum.
Must be the testosterone causing some guys to be reactionary against lesbians and some gay guys to be reactionary against women in general. And God forbid one be bisexual and get ...[text shortened]... d of the political spectrum, so it irritates me to see these kinds of attitudes on the left as well.
If you are actually psychic, then we need to have a discussion about etiquette and mental boundaries. 😉
Is this some kind of Buddhist-Psychological test?
I don't remember having signed any consent forms.
As for testosterone, I have seen you on many occasions telling others to "grow some balls" -- which makes me wonder how many balls you yourself have grown.
What makes you think I'm on the left or right or anywhere politically?
Or are we back to you trying to dictate to me what my politics should be based on some personal demographic item that you remember and that I regret ever having disclosed?
I'm not as much against you as you seem to believe I am (house of mirrors in a fog, I know), but have you considered that you might be choosing to feel irritated instead of being passively irritated by your perceptions of external whatever?
1 edit
@My-King-And-I saidGitmo.
No examples yet?
Oh I forgot... you're part of the sonhouse and Suzanne delusional brigade 🙄
Ree Tar Did
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/expanding-migrant-operations-center-at-naval-station-guantanamo-bay-to-full-capacity/
@Arkturos saidI know you from your posts, as I knew the other you from your posts.
How would you know what ideas I have? It's pretty much a vague blizzard of this and that in my head, usually.
If you are actually psychic, then we need to have a discussion about etiquette and mental boundaries. 😉
Is this some kind of Buddhist-Psychological test?
I don't remember having signed any consent forms.
As for testosterone, I have seen you on many occas ...[text shortened]... ing to feel irritated instead of being passively irritated by your perceptions of external whatever?
Just as I expect you to know me by my posts.
It's not rocket science.
See, your post is exactly what I'm talking about.
You throw up all these "Neener, neener" posts, when all you should be doing is be straight with me. I didn't answer all your PMs for the same reason, your apparent inability to be straight with me.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
@Suzianne saidI find you to be an incomprehensibly difficult person to interact with.
I know you from your posts, as I knew the other you from your posts.
Just as I expect you to know me by my posts.
It's not rocket science.
See, your post is exactly what I'm talking about.
You throw up all these "Neener, neener" posts, when all you should be doing is be straight with me. I didn't answer all your PMs for the same reason, your apparent inability to be straight with me.
Good day to you, and fare thee well.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
2 edits
@Suzianne saidOn my side, you seem prone to misperception [as are most or all humans (so I gather; haven't interviewed them all myself) -- it's part of the human experience, as I imagine you know already (he elaborated in an explanatory parenthetical remark which some might call an expository lump)].
I know you from your posts, as I knew the other you from your posts.
Just as I expect you to know me by my posts.
It's not rocket science.
See, your post is exactly what I'm talking about.
You throw up all these "Neener, neener" posts, when all you should be doing is be straight with me. I didn't answer all your PMs for the same reason, your apparent inability to be straight with me.
Or were you teasing me, and I missed it? 🤔
But if you were being serious, here's one recent example of a misperception: in a thread in the SF which has been deleted, somehow it seems you thought my topic of "connivers wearing Crosses" was a dig at you personally, when that was never my intention. I only had in mind political and some public religious figures who seem to wear the Cross as a tool of manipulation (or as a signal to others about things that have nothing to do with Christianity). That was you who decided to feel attacked and to take offense, from my POV.
As for being straight with you, I have already stated publicly that out of GQBLT+ I am only G (and maybe +). But now I shall reveal that I am probably too scruffy to be considered GQ, but I do like the occasional BLT (sandwich -- in a food sense involving bread, not people).
@Suzianne saidLMFAO...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/alanavalko/trump-pink-triangle-post
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114132787592380677
People Cannot Believe This "Terrifying" Post By Trump Is Real
"There’s no more hiding their ideology."
The second Trump-era administration has aggressively targeted the LGBTQ+ community — from declaring "only two sexes" to signing se ...[text shortened]... aware of the symbol's significance or not, his decision to share it has sparked backlash from many.
- Joined
- 06 May 15
- Moves
- 29080
1 edit
@Suzianne saidOf course you may decline this opportunity, but why don't you describe the "true me" and "the other me" in a couple of short paragraphs (or even just two strings of descriptive words and phrases)?
I know you from your posts, as I knew the other you from your posts.
Just as I expect you to know me by my posts.
It's not rocket science.
See, your post is exactly what I'm talking about.
You throw up all these "Neener, neener" posts, when all you should be doing is be straight with me. I didn't answer all your PMs for the same reason, your apparent inability to be straight with me.
@Arkturos saidI think I've just done this.
Of course you may decline this opportunity, but why don't you describe the "true me" and "the other me" in a couple of short paragraphs (or even just two strings of descriptive words and phrases)?
(I didn't read this post until just now.)