@Rajk999 saidExcept he didn't try to and they shot him in the back of the head at point blank range after he was disarmed.
Yeah the truth is starting to come out about this guy and so far it aint nice. In addition to that spitting, kicking episode, the ex wife said he is a weirdo and abusive. The workers where he formerly worked said he abused patients. Would he be the type to shoot ICE agents? YES !!! Good riddance.
Minority Report type speculation doesn't legally excuse that.
@Rajk999 saidMaybe we should round up "the type" before they commit crimes and separate them from the public.
Yeah the truth is starting to come out about this guy and so far it aint nice. In addition to that spitting, kicking episode, the ex wife said he is a weirdo and abusive. The workers where he formerly worked said he abused patients. Would he be the type to shoot ICE agents? YES !!! Good riddance.
@fornichessate saidDid you even watch the video?
You asked why he wasn't arrested the week before.
I answered it. The pussy democrat cops are too scared to do their jobs.
No Minneapolis cops are present, but ICE agents are. They see him break the taillight and wrestle him to the ground but then release him.
What does that have to do with Minneapolis cops who's job isn't to provide security for federal immigration actions? ICE and CBP have poured 3,000 agents, more than 5 times the number of local police (who still have their jobs to do) and can't perform their own security?
Who's the "pussies"?
@fornichessate removed their quoted postStop dodging. We both know they could have arrested Pretti for breaking the taillight (it's Federal property after all) but for some reason they didn't even after restraining him.
Minneapolis cops have nothing to do with it.
The post that was quoted here has been removedNone of that is legally relevant; it's just victim blaming.
The fact is he was shot in the back of the head at pont blank range while unarmed. And that hardly meets the requirements for a legally justified use of deadly force i.e. a reasonable person in the user's position must have believed he or others were in imminent danger of death or great physical harm.
Smearing the victim won't change the facts.
@fornichessate removed their quoted postThey could see his hands were empty except for his cellphone.
@fornichessate removed their quoted postUnarmed man shot in the back of the head at point blank range sure sounds like a case to me. Maybe if they're lucky the bumbling drops it down to manslaughter.
@fornichessate removed their quoted postGive me a Minnesota jury and the defense better pray for voluntary manslaughter.