Tucker and Assange

@wajoma said
Noted. Neither intelligence nor courage, only an unhealthy fascination with revenge porn and old man dick pics.

Thanks for your confession, but we didn't even ask for it. TMI.

@wajoma said
When Assange was posting stuff about the Bush era Iraq war suziman was eating it up.

Assange did a lot of praiseworthy reveals of information the People had a right to know.

I don't even blame him for releasing the DNC e-mails stolen by the Russians or refusing to reveal its sources.

Implying Seth Rich had something to do with it was pretty low though.

Anyway, he should be pardoned for any of the revealing of secrets of governments or political parties.

@suzianne said
Thanks for your confession, but we didn't even ask for it. TMI.

And thankyou, for inviting me to post your verbatim words again, (like anyone has forgotten who said what) here we go:

suziman said:

"One of them needs to get pics (you know, of the tiny bits), take his money, then "accidentally" release the pics anyways."

Pretty hard to turn that one around, but funny in a kind of maggot squirming way to watch.

@no1marauder said
Assange did a lot of praiseworthy reveals of information the People had a right to know.

I don't even blame him for releasing the DNC e-mails stolen by the Russians or refusing to reveal its sources.

Implying Seth Rich had something to do with it was pretty low though.

Anyway, he should be pardoned for any of the revealing of secrets of governments or political parties.

Seth Rich revealed that, not the Russians. That is disinformation. Assange said so and calling him a liar is pathetic. What possible incentive would he have to lie?
Why do you think Seth Rich was shot twice in the back? We are all waiting for your conspiracy theory.

@metal-brain said
Seth Rich revealed that, not the Russians. That is disinformation. Assange said so and calling him a liar is pathetic. What possible incentive would he have to lie?
Why do you think Seth Rich was shot twice in the back? We are all waiting for your conspiracy theory.

Seth Rich revealed nothing as he was dead.

Assange's motive was obvious; to hide the identity of where he got the e-mails from. But it was scummy to try to foist it off on a dead man who had nothing to do with it. In any event, we know that it was the Russian military that sent the e-mails to Wikileaks; the Muller report even identified the exact title of the data file sent by the Russians to Wikileaks!

And no, I'm not going to go all over this for the 100th time here.

@no1marauder said
Seth Rich revealed nothing as he was dead.

Assange's motive was obvious; to hide the identity of where he got the e-mails from. But it was scummy to try to foist it off on a dead man who had nothing to do with it. In any event, we know that it was the Russian military that sent the e-mails to Wikileaks; the Muller report even identified the exact title of the data file ...[text shortened]... by the Russians to Wikileaks!

And no, I'm not going to go all over this for the 100th time here.

Assange revealed that and you know it. Stop lying.

"Assange's motive was obvious; to hide the identity of where he got the e-mails from"

What was his motive to hide where he got the emails from? He is not in prison for hiding where he got them, he is in prison for revealing the information. He exposed war crimes. He had no incentive to lie.

You bought into disinformation again. Do you believe Russia took out their own pipeline despite Biden saying he would do it too? You seem to have a leap of faith in known liars.

@metal-brain said
Assange revealed that and you know it. Stop lying.

"Assange's motive was obvious; to hide the identity of where he got the e-mails from"

What was his motive to hide where he got the emails from? He is not in prison for hiding where he got them, he is in prison for revealing the information. He exposed war crimes. He had no incentive to lie.

You bought into disin ...[text shortened]... n pipeline despite Biden saying he would do it too? You seem to have a leap of faith in known liars.

He never reveals his sources as you would know if you had even a passing knowledge of the work he did. I respect that, which is why his public insinuation regarding Seth Rich was so disappointing to me.

Stop with irrelevant sidebars that have nothing to do with this discussion and have been covered many times on this board.

@no1marauder said
He never reveals his sources as you would know if you had even a passing knowledge of the work he did. I respect that, which is why his public insinuation regarding Seth Rich was so disappointing to me.

Stop with irrelevant sidebars that have nothing to do with this discussion and have been covered many times on this board.

Then how do you know he got those emails from Russia? Assange never said he got them from Russia. In fact, he denied that and heavily implied it was Seth Rich as you well know. Do you always pretend you don't know things you obviously do?

What was his motive to hide where he got the emails from? He is not in prison for hiding where he got them, he is in prison for revealing the information. He exposed war crimes. He had no incentive to lie.

@metal-brain said
Then how do you know he got those emails from Russia? Assange never said he got them from Russia. In fact, he denied that and heavily implied it was Seth Rich as you well know. Do you always pretend you don't know things you obviously do?

What was his motive to hide where he got the emails from? He is not in prison for hiding where he got them, he is in prison for revealing the information. He exposed war crimes. He had no incentive to lie.

I've already answered this dozens of times and cited you to the section of the Muller Report where the name of the datafile sent to wikileaks is identified as well as the date and time it was sent by the Russian military. I'm not going to do so again here.

I already answered why Assange didn't reveal he got the information from Russia; he never reveals his sources, so his implication he got it from Seth Rich (he never actually said so) is obvious misdirection. It was scummy to use a dead man's name who couldn't defend himself though; I lost a lot of respect for Assange when he did so.

@no1marauder said
I've already answered this dozens of times and cited you to the section of the Muller Report where the name of the datafile sent to wikileaks is identified as well as the date and time it was sent by the Russian military. I'm not going to do so again here.

I already answered why Assange didn't reveal he got the information from Russia; he never reveals his sources, so ...[text shortened]... d man's name who couldn't defend himself though; I lost a lot of respect for Assange when he did so.

Assange said he never got them from Russia. Saying it was not Russia is not revealing his source, but he definitely implied it was Seth Rich as you well know.
Why do you insist he was lying? What is your source of information?

@metal-brain said
Assange said he never got them from Russia. Saying it was not Russia is not revealing his source, but he definitely implied it was Seth Rich as you well know.
Why do you insist he was lying? What is your source of information?

He lied.

You know the source of the information and I've directed you to the specific page in the Mueller Report many times.

@no1marauder said
He lied.

You know the source of the information and I've directed you to the specific page in the Mueller Report many times.

LOL!
So you think the guy that botched up the anthrax investigation costing the FBI millions of dollars in a lawsuit proving Mueller was on a witch hunt is not a liar? LOL!

What is Mueller's source of information? Crowdstrike? LOL!
So your source of information is a Russian? LOL!

@metal-brain said
LOL!
So you think the guy that botched up the anthrax investigation costing the FBI millions of dollars in a lawsuit proving Mueller was on a witch hunt is not a liar? LOL!

What is Mueller's source of information? Crowdstrike? LOL!
So your source of information is a Russian? LOL!

Whatever. Your stupid conspiracy theories exonerating Russia from any misconduct are the laughingstock of this board.

How did the Mueller report know the exact name of the file sent to Wikileaks and the date and time it was sent?

@no1marauder said
Whatever. Your stupid conspiracy theories exonerating Russia from any misconduct are the laughingstock of this board.

How did the Mueller report know the exact name of the file sent to Wikileaks and the date and time it was sent?

You are projecting again. Russiagate is your conspiracy theory, not mine. You are the conspiracy theorist regarding this. Mueller found no evidence proving Russia hacked the DNC as you well know. What part of "no evidence don't you understand? And don't bother falsely claiming circumstantial evidence is evidence. That is just stupid.

@wajoma said
And thankyou, for inviting me to post your verbatim words again, (like anyone has forgotten who said what) here we go:

suziman said:

"One of them needs to get pics (you know, of the tiny bits), take his money, then "accidentally" release the pics anyways."

Pretty hard to turn that one around, but funny in a kind of maggot squirming way to watch.

Missing the entire point, as usual.