Originally posted by Eladar
From another site:
[b]when we control for traffic fatalities and homicides, “The US jumps from 15th on the list with a life expectancy of 75.3 to 1st with a life expectancy of 76.9.”
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/us_life_expectancy_were_number_1/[/b]
You read it in the NY Times over and over. They complain that the US health care is bad because our life expectancy is not as high as some countries with socialized medicine.
Even without extensive statistical training or other background information, an average intelligence person can see the fallacy of this. But we don't get to write for the NY Times, and their authors keep repeating this fallacy over and over.
The premise of the article in the OP was to do some simple analysis to dispel the myth and show how deceptive a crude study on life expectancy is. The goal was not really to prove the US is number one.
As mentioned, if a country has more young people dying in traffic accidents then probably that should not count against their medical system. If someone dies on impact in a car crash, that is not a bad mark against any medical system. But if someone gets a gash in a car wreck, goes to the hospital and dies of an infection, that is a mark against the medical system.
My gut instinct is that almost any first world country is going to do a great job treating victims of car crashes once they get to the emergency room (or even in the ambulance).
But the original article must have struck a nerve with folks that have an emotional stake in believing the US health care is so bad judging from the responses.