Go back
USA military deaths under Bush

USA military deaths under Bush

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
http://icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx
So? Would you like a link to the number of casualties from WWII or perhaps the Civil War? There are a vast number of presidents you can take issue with purely on the basis of casualties.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
So? Would you like a link to the number of casualties from WWII or perhaps the Civil War? There are a vast number of presidents you can take issue with purely on the basis of casualties.
That's brilliant reasoning; so no matter what a current President does your response is "What about Franklin Pierce"?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That's brilliant reasoning; so no matter what a current President does your response is "What about Franklin Pierce"?
No, no, to the contrary my friend. What I am attempting to establish is the purpose in this thread. Thus far, I have a link. Ok. So? It may be normative and natural for me to assume that this is about the death toll being unacceptable, but if there is a topic to actually be 'debated' here, let's cut the assuming and have it stated clearly.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
No, no, to the contrary my friend. What I am attempting to establish is the purpose in this thread. Thus far, I have a link. Ok. So? It may be normative and natural for me to assume that this is about the death toll being unacceptable, but if there is a topic to actually be 'debated' here, let's cut the assuming and have it stated clearly.
Are you accusing STANG of being too subtle?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Are you accusing STANG of being too subtle?
Well, his is well known for his subtlety. Almost as much as for his ability to produce a clear, logical statement.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
Well, his is well known for his subtlety. Almost as much as for his ability to produce a clear, logical statement.
Subtle

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Civilian Deaths under President Sadam Hussain, 1.2 million

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Civilian Deaths under President Sadam Hussain, 1.2 million
Yes, they both deserve similar fates.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
Yes, they both deserve similar fates.
Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually ask you your opinion on something (God help me).

Being that you condemn Dubya for the war, how do you feel about our representatives? It was they who granted him the power to go ahead with this. What blame (if any) to you put on all of our other elected officials who assisted in this action?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually ask you your opinion on something (God help me).

Being that you condemn Dubya for the war, how do you feel about our representatives? It was they who granted him the power to go ahead with this. What blame (if any) to you put on all of our other elected officials who assisted in this action?
As I've said before, there should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
As I've said before, there should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry.
I think that's good and well STANG, but just how much accountability do you believe our senators have in this? After all, if Bush is a war monger, they gave him the tools to do so. Are they not as accountable (or more) for the war?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
I think that's good and well STANG, but just how much accountability do you believe our senators have in this? After all, if Bush is a war monger, they gave him the tools to do so. Are they not as accountable (or more) for the war?
I'd start with investigating if they have personal financial interests in things like Middle Eastern oil and military equipment manufacturers.

Accountability must ultimately rest with Bush, in much ths same way as it does with Saddam.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
I'd start with investigating if they have personal financial interests in things like Middle Eastern oil and military equipment manufacturers.

Accountability must ultimately rest with Bush, in much ths same way as it does with Saddam.
Why? Bush is only 1/3 of our government. He is a fairly impotent person if the other 2/3 refuse to back him. Why must accountability rest 'ultimately' with him? He is one man. His decisions were put into action because a vast number of our representatives gave him the power to do so. Why are they not equally as responsible? As a collective, they had as much to say about the war as Bush did.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Omnislash
Why? Bush is only 1/3 of our government. He is a fairly impotent person if the other 2/3 refuse to back him. Why must accountability rest 'ultimately' with him? He is one man. His decisions were put into action because a vast number of our representatives gave him the power to do so. Why are they not equally as responsible? As a collective, they had as much to say about the war as Bush did.
Think about it.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.