Originally posted by STANGNo sir, you have not.
I have.
Since understanding the simplistic statements I have made is apparently difficult for you, I shall repeat myself, and attempt to expound (if such is possible).
What portion of responsibility do our other elected officials (specifically, the senate) for the current state of affairs in our country?
Being that they represent 1/3 of the governing power (and that Bush would have no power to alter the economy, go to war, etc. without their support), should not they as a collective bear as much responsibility for the state of affiars (Iraq, etc.) as the president?
In summary (since one is apaprently needed), the question is what responsibility do our senators have for the current state of affairs, given the dispersement of power I have mentioned?
Originally posted by STANGSo, there should be a powerful, independent inquiry for the senators, but untill then we will just point all the fingers at Bush and blame him and him alone for everything from the war to the economy, right?
As I've said before, there should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry.
Originally posted by STANGAs I've said before, there should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry.
As I've said before, there should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry.
There should be a powerful, independent and public inquiry of your spamming the RHP forums with your biased drivel.