@athousandyoung saidCan anyone agree that it is very comforting to know that we have a lot of OTHER submarines to cover any such problems? That, we are smart to have a large, and yes expensive, military?
USS Connecticut
[youtube Sub Brief]5VKQPBhu0z0[/youtube]
@averagejoe1 saidYou mean we have spare submarines in case we need to sink Chinese ships?
Can anyone agree that it is very comforting to know that we have a lot of OTHER submarines to cover any such problems? That, we are smart to have a large, and yes expensive, military?
@athousandyoung saidwell, yes, but might I paraphrase, that we will need submarines to do whatever is needed by your armed forces to protect the liberals in our society from attack, as they certainly cannot defend themselves. Other than that Son person, who is armed to the hilt for all the wrong reasons, I doubt a lib here would even know how to pick up a rifle.
You mean we have spare submarines in case we need to sink Chinese ships?
Much less to shoot to kill!!!!! I would. I prob wouldn't shoot a lib trying to get my stuff, though...I would just give it to him. I guess I am a wimp. A pushover. Come get it. 🙂
@averagejoe1 saidWe have submarines in the south China sea so that you fatcat meatloafers can try to bully other nations overseas for purposes of your profit. They aren't defending me in any way whatsoever.
well, yes, but might I paraphrase, that we will need submarines to do whatever is needed by your armed forces to protect the liberals in our society from attack, as they certainly cannot defend themselves. Other than that Son person, who is armed to the hilt for all the wrong reasons, I doubt a lib here would even know how to pick up a rifle.
Much less to shoot to ...[text shortened]... t my stuff, though...I would just give it to him. I guess I am a wimp. A pushover. Come get it. 🙂
You wouldn't shoot a lib taking your stuff because you would be far away hiding and whining that the police who you don't want to pay aren't doing enough to lock away the poor in the prisons you don't want to fund.
@athousandyoung saidI think that your first paragraph is, in effect, saying that we want to WIN against all of those nations. For once, you have something right! Welcome to the knowledge of the concept of winning. Please tell me that you are not a loser, Thousand??
We have submarines in the south China sea so that you fatcat meatloafers can try to bully other nations overseas for purposes of your profit. They aren't defending me in any way whatsoever.
You wouldn't shoot a lib taking your stuff because you would be far away hiding and whining that the police who you don't want to pay aren't doing enough to lock away the poor in the prisons you don't want to fund.
Everyone, write this down in your journals...Thousand says, and he is an American, that the USA does not defend him in ANY WAY!!!! haahhahhahahaahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahah. Jesus tomatoes. Does everyone know what mindsets we are dealing with on the Forum?? I think I have just gotten the answer to the question I asked above in the first paragraph.
Your last sentence lacks punch, but so what, given the ones before that!!!!
Holy smokes.
Everyone, tell your friends to get over to this Thread. Fish in a barrel. Hey, did you see where Kev, in response to my saying a business owner may close his business and move to Italy,,,,,he mentioned Bezos (as all of you do) 'cannot close his business', ........ I wrote back, to enlighten him that Bezos does not OWN Amazon. In short, fish in a barrel, I shot Kev. He did NOT write back.
@averagejoe1 saidThe only time anyone ever attacked California is when the USA did in 1846. What exactly is it that we're being protected from?
I think that your first paragraph is, in effect, saying that we want to WIN against all of those nations. For once, you have something right! Welcome to the knowledge of the concept of winning. Please tell me that you are not a loser, Thousand??
Everyone, write this down in your journals...Thousand says, and he is an American, that the USA does not defend him in ...[text shortened]... him that Bezos does not OWN Amazon. In short, fish in a barrel, I shot Kev. He did NOT write back.
@athousandyoung saidAttacks?
The only time anyone ever attacked California is when the USA did in 1846. What exactly is it that we're being protected from?
@athousandyoung saidAre you under an illusion that, if the west pulled back, militarily, China would not try to dominate the world, and if we pulled back to the extent that you may want, would not "own" the world, therefore dictate what you may or may not do, say, and think, as they do to their own??
The only time anyone ever attacked California is when the USA did in 1846. What exactly is it that we're being protected from?
We would all live under communism.
@jimmac saidI didn't express any desire to "pull back militarily".
Are you under an illusion that, if the west pulled back, militarily, China would not try to dominate the world, and if we pulled back to the extent that you may want, would not "own" the world, therefore dictate what you may or may not do, say, and think, as they do to their own??
We would all live under communism.
What does all this have to do with how a nuclear attack sub is protecting me in California? You really expect China to send an amphibious assault flotilla to invade Los Angeles? Please.
@athousandyoung saidok, fair enough, but in the event that we do not have these nuclear subs protecting you from wherever they are, surely world domination ends up including California.
I didn't express any desire to "pull back militarily".
What does all this have to do with how a nuclear attack sub is protecting me in California? You really expect China to send an amphibious assault flotilla to invade Los Angeles? Please.
And your comment " We have submarines in the south China sea so that you fatcat meatloafers can try to bully other nations overseas for purposes of your profit. They aren't defending me in any way whatsoever. " alludes to not needing the military.
I now get that you are saying, " not in the south China sea " but from my position, I believe that you do. If you don't, then you are effectively capitulating.
@athousandyoung saidSo you have no problem with China invading Taiwan.
The world has gone a long time without anyone getting any kind of world domination without needing the USA's forward projected military. World domination is harder than you seem to think.