@shavixmir said"If the Germans were planning on doing this it would be all over normal news sites."
I’m not going to read your right-wing conspiratol trash.
If the Germans were planning on doing this it would be all over normal news sites.
There would be pre-voting debates, there would be doctors, privacy authorities, etc. weighing in; in fact, since privacy is EU-wide, my IAPP feed would have informed me about it.
So, it’s “expected” to pass is it?
When is it be ...[text shortened]... which goal group, how long is information going to be “stored”?
And then all my previous questions.
Care to make a bet on that?
@metal-brain saidSomeone else has already bet with you.
"If the Germans were planning on doing this it would be all over normal news sites."
Care to make a bet on that?
You can’t answer the questions.
That’s because you’re using a nutter-website which spews forth generalisations. Which you accept; hook, line and sinker.
And as soon as someone goes into any detail, the whole story falls apart. But you cling to it as if your life depended on it.
Do you seriously think the German government can just vote to add chips to a vaccine?
You don’t think there are medicial experts, privacy officers, security officers, battalions of other experts who’d need to judge it, form opinions on it, write reports on it, etc.?
You don’t think the EU privacy watchdog would be publishing guidelines on it?
You don’t think something like this wouldn’t be major news on every bloody network?
You’re a conspiracy nut. Accept it. Then get some bloody therapy.
@shavixmir saidYou are lying.
Someone else has already bet with you.
You can’t answer the questions.
That’s because you’re using a nutter-website which spews forth generalisations. Which you accept; hook, line and sinker.
And as soon as someone goes into any detail, the whole story falls apart. But you cling to it as if your life depended on it.
Do you seriously think the German government can ...[text shortened]... r news on every bloody network?
You’re a conspiracy nut. Accept it. Then get some bloody therapy.
Nobody has already bet me.
Are you willing to bet or not?
@metal-brain saidExplain exactly what the bet is and then we will talk about the stakes
You are lying.
Nobody has already bet me.
Are you willing to bet or not?
Spoiler alert start looking for another web site to troll
@shavixmir saidThese are the people who convinced themselves that Trump would declare martial law and vanquish the child eating pedophile lizards up until lunch time on Inauguration Day.
I’m not going to read your right-wing conspiratol trash.
If the Germans were planning on doing this it would be all over normal news sites.
There would be pre-voting debates, there would be doctors, privacy authorities, etc. weighing in; in fact, since privacy is EU-wide, my IAPP feed would have informed me about it.
So, it’s “expected” to pass is it?
When is it be ...[text shortened]... which goal group, how long is information going to be “stored”?
And then all my previous questions.
@metal-brain saidYou are asking people to bet against the German government allowing people to voluntarily get some kind of chip via a vaccine at some unspecified point in future space time.
You are lying.
Nobody has already bet me.
Are you willing to bet or not?
Not much of a gambler huh.
@kevcvs57 saidUh... metalbrain... this is the post on the first page.
Listen idiot child even if they did pass a vaccine with a chip in it those taking the vaccine will be informed so it’s not related to one of your conspiracies theories is it!
Are you offering a bet that Germany is either going to force its citizens to take a chipped vaccine or give its citizens a chipped vaccine without telling them?
I’ll take either bet but I want a deadline otherwise you’ll keep telling me to “wait and it’ll happen any day now”.
Obviously he’s laying down some rules, but he was taking you up on your bet.
@kevcvs57 saidEven if there was going to be any kind of voluntary chipping, it won’t be in a vaccine.
You are asking people to bet against the German government allowing people to voluntarily get some kind of chip via a vaccine at some unspecified point in future space time.
Not much of a gambler huh.
@kevcvs57 saidI know.
These are the people who convinced themselves that Trump would declare martial law and vanquish the child eating pedophile lizards up until lunch time on Inauguration Day.
But I’m sick to death of conspiracy nuts.
I recokon the next time someone explains to me that it’s cultural marxist elites together with the main stream media who, in our postmodernism world, are undermining democracy by disallowing certain points of view and promoting cancel culture... I’m just gonna lash out and hospitalize them.
@shavixmir saidI offered the bet to Suzi. Is Kev willing to meet the same rules as my bet with Wildgrass? He needs to specify the bet since the bet was not offered to him. What is his claim? What is yours?
Uh... metalbrain... this is the post on the first page.
Obviously he’s laying down some rules, but he was taking you up on your bet.
@shavixmir saidWhat is your source of information? Stop lying!
Even if there was going to be any kind of voluntary chipping, it won’t be in a vaccine.
@shavixmir saidWhat conspiracy? This is verifiable technology.
I know.
But I’m sick to death of conspiracy nuts.
I recokon the next time someone explains to me that it’s cultural marxist elites together with the main stream media who, in our postmodernism world, are undermining democracy by disallowing certain points of view and promoting cancel culture... I’m just gonna lash out and hospitalize them.
You seem to be in denial of reality. Technology is at a more advanced level than you realize. You are ignorant to this reality. Look up "Hydrogels" and "Transfection". You might learn something.
@metal-brain saidDude.
What conspiracy? This is verifiable technology.
You seem to be in denial of reality. Technology is at a more advanced level than you realize. You are ignorant to this reality. Look up "Hydrogels" and "Transfection". You might learn something.
Shut up. You have no idea what you’re on about.
This isn’t about technology.
@shavixmir saidDude, I created this thread, not you.
Dude.
Shut up. You have no idea what you’re on about.
This isn’t about technology.
It is about technology.
Tell the Rockefeller Foundation they don't know what they are talking about. They had the idea over 10 years ago.
@metal-brain saidTHE TECHNOLOGY EXISTS.
Dude, I created this thread, not you.
It is about technology.
Tell the Rockefeller Foundation they don't know what they are talking about. They had the idea over 10 years ago.
IDEAS EXIST.
This is not the issue with what you and your retarded source are suggesting.
Politics, watchdogs, privacy, security, compliance, etc. These are the issues which make your story bogus from the start.
Show me the DPIA and I might look into it with more than ridicule. You can’t. It’s not happening. You’ve been duped.
THINK!
Why don’t they hand passports out in hospitals when babies are born? How many checks are in place for passports, how are they and the computer systems protected? Which information can be found on a passport. Who is the passport from (the government)? Etc.
All these things are found in rapports, studies, DPIA’s, security analysis, audits, etc.
An ID chip will have all these things as well. Before being introduced. They’re not there.
How can a political entity vote for A, when A isn’t defined, has no scope and nothing is in place?
What a political entity could do is vote to open research on the matter. Give an order to research the feasability.
And that’s that.