1. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    07 Aug '10 12:31
    BBC:

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has said his foreign minister will attend the inauguration of new Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos.

    The apparent easing of relations came two weeks after President Chavez broke off relations with Colombia.

    The row erupted after Bogota accused Mr Chavez of harbouring Colombian rebels.

    Mr Chavez also said he was optimistic mediation efforts by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva would ease tensions with Colombia.

    President Lula has been encouraging President Chavez to resume dialogue with Colombia.

    While President Chavez did not give any details of his discussions with his Brazilian counterpart in the Venezuelan capital Caracas, he said he had asked President Lula "to convey my greetings to the new president of Colombia".


    Can we expect a warming of relations between Venezuela and Colombia, or do retail politicians like President Hugo Chavez and President Juan Manuel Santos perhaps need a wee bit of ongoing argy bargy?
  2. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    07 Aug '10 13:48
    I think they both can use a bit of distracting from domestic woes, although neither of them will want a full-scale war.
  3. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    07 Aug '10 17:24
    Originally posted by FMF
    BBC:

    [quote]Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has said his foreign minister will attend the inauguration of new Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos.

    The apparent easing of relations came two weeks after President Chavez broke off relations with Colombia.

    The row erupted after Bogota accused Mr Chavez of harbouring Colombian rebels.

    Mr Chavez also s ...[text shortened]... ent Hugo Chavez and President Juan Manuel Santos perhaps need a wee bit of ongoing argy bargy?
    The relations between venezuela and colombia can be compared to that of a stormy marriage. They bicker constantly and every now and then threaten to resort to radical solutions when the argument gets more severe, but at the end they always kiss and make up.
  4. Joined
    26 Dec '08
    Moves
    3130
    08 Aug '10 19:18
    It's still not fun for the residents and the parents of soldiers and the businessmen and the foreign investors and anyone who gives a hoot about those countries' developments. Chavez harbors some guerillas, Colombia embarasses Venezuela before the international community by showing facts that support these charges and raising the accusations before international bodies, and Venezuela then threatens war based on the accusations being an insult.

    It wouldn't make any sense for Chavez to attack a country the US military using the nation's airbases.

    Still, the drama does not help economic growth or poverty reduction, if anything the spat has cost both sides significant economic progress.
  5. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Aug '10 19:251 edit
    Columbia has a very interesting geographic position. It is the only land access to central and North America, and it has access to the oceans on either side.

    It also has that central spike aimed at Venezuela's center at the headwaters of the Orinoco River. If I were Chavez I'd take Colombia very seriously. How are their relative militaries and economies?

    http://www.geographicguide.com/pictures/maps/political-south-america.gif
  6. Joined
    26 Dec '08
    Moves
    3130
    08 Aug '10 20:33
    I'll check out now days but in recent years Colombia's millitary was more modernized and had more practice fighting with all its anti-guerilla work. Then oil prices shot up and Venezuela's economy had a boon way above its spending commitments and Chavez upgrated its military buying many Russian tanks and he upgraded planes to sukhoi planes, etc, giving him the edge on conventional warfare thought with less experienced troops.
  7. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Aug '10 20:42
    Is there a large naval base at the headwaters of the Orinoco? What's the terrain like there? I'm guessing mountainous, rainy and foresty.
  8. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    08 Aug '10 20:45
    Originally posted by eljefejesus
    I'll check out now days but in recent years Colombia's millitary was more modernized and had more practice fighting with all its anti-guerilla work. Then oil prices shot up and Venezuela's economy had a boon way above its spending commitments and Chavez upgrated its military buying many Russian tanks and he upgraded planes to sukhoi planes, etc, giving him the edge on conventional warfare thought with less experienced troops.
    Venezuela is #1 oil reserves nation on the planet! I guess they're to be taken seriously as well...Columbia should just legalize and start taxing coke growers.

    http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_56766.shtml
  9. Joined
    26 Dec '08
    Moves
    3130
    08 Aug '10 23:10
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Is there a large naval base at the headwaters of the Orinoco? What's the terrain like there? I'm guessing mountainous, rainy and foresty.
    Some rivers from the Amazon connect with the Oronoco. The Delta of the Orinoco is mostly in Venezuelan waters, but their upgrades there have also been mainly Russian weapons including subs. Colombia could certainly defend itself but could probably use additional modernizations to deal with conventional foreign threats such as taks, migs, subs, etc. With the tropical and mountainous terrain across much of their shared border Colombia's experience with counter-insurgency and rebel fighting would certainly come in handy.
  10. Pepperland
    Joined
    30 May '07
    Moves
    12892
    09 Aug '10 17:071 edit
    Originally posted by eljefejesus
    It's still not fun for the residents and the parents of soldiers and the businessmen and the foreign investors and anyone who gives a hoot about those countries' developments. Chavez harbors some guerillas, Colombia embarasses Venezuela before the international community by showing facts that support these charges and raising the accusations before inte r poverty reduction, if anything the spat has cost both sides significant economic progress.
    Undoubtedly the mean-spirited nature of these arguments offers no benefit to the countries involved, but I wouldn't say they seriously hinder economic progress, especially considering just how short-lived they are. Furthermore, chavez's threats could hardly be taken seriously, he has a sharp tongue and a well-known tendency to be publicly hostile towards leaders he disagrees with, his threats have no substance whatsoever.
  11. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    09 Aug '10 17:57
    Originally posted by eljefejesus
    Some rivers from the Amazon connect with the Oronoco. The Delta of the Orinoco is mostly in Venezuelan waters, but their upgrades there have also been mainly Russian weapons including subs. Colombia could certainly defend itself but could probably use additional modernizations to deal with conventional foreign threats such as taks, migs, subs, etc. Wi ...[text shortened]... Colombia's experience with counter-insurgency and rebel fighting would certainly come in handy.
    My thinking is that the river runs west to east right down the center of Venezuela. It would be a good means of sending troops, goods or whatever from Colombia through Venezuela.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree