@shavixmir saidAppointed by who?
I meant JD.
And yes, I think a panel would be good.
But not appointed by the bloody candidates.
@Metal-Brain saidFact checking is checking facts, NOT "asserting an opinion", fool.
Who is JE?
Either both candidates should be fact checked or neither of them. If you are going to insist on continued fact checking (opinion asserting) then I suggest a fact checking panel at the debates.
Let each candidate appoint fact checkers to the panel. Agreed?
@Metal-Brain saidPiss off.
Lying about what?
Tell me what I lied about and prove I said it since you claim it is on record.
I'm done wasting my time with an unrepentant moron.
@Metal-Brain saidWell, anyone really, except the parties of the people debating.
Appointed by who?
Journalists, private eyes, students doing law school, Mensa members, that sort of thing. Basically anyone with enough common sense to comprehend the difference between stating an opinion on the economy and claiming that immigrants are eating pets.
Someone who triggers when something unbelievable is being declared as a fact, but doesn’t trigger when it’s in the realm of normality.
So: “scientists say that global warming is a problem that needs addressing.”
- No fact check needed.
So: “the Earth is flat and reptile penguins are eating our cars.”
- fact check the hell out of it.
It’s really not rocket science. Your paranoid brain is fvcking with you.
@shavixmir saidAnyone? Then me. Is that acceptable to you?
Well, anyone really, except the parties of the people debating.
Journalists, private eyes, students doing law school, Mensa members, that sort of thing. Basically anyone with enough common sense to comprehend the difference between stating an opinion on the economy and claiming that immigrants are eating pets.
Someone who triggers when something unbelievable is being ...[text shortened]... heck the hell out of it.
It’s really not rocket science. Your paranoid brain is fvcking with you.
"So: “scientists say that global warming is a problem that needs addressing.”
- No fact check needed."
Scientists say it is not a problem that needs addressing. We are both right. No fact check needed.
Scientists are not qualified for judging if GW is a problem though. A metallurgist is a scientist, but does he know anything about climate change?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallurgy
There are lots of scientist who are completely unqualified in the area of climate change. Are they really the experts?
@AverageJoe1 saidDid you hear any of that speech?
Can someone rustle up a photo of the crowd that went to see Trump yesterday in PA??
Just embarrassing.
@Metal-Brain saidStop talking about fringe "scientists" like they are the mainstream. They're not.
Anyone? Then me. Is that acceptable to you?
"So: “scientists say that global warming is a problem that needs addressing.”
- No fact check needed."
Scientists say it is not a problem that needs addressing. We are both right. No fact check needed.
Scientists are not qualified for judging if GW is a problem though. A metallurgist is a scientist, but does he know any ...[text shortened]... scientist who are completely unqualified in the area of climate change. Are they really the experts?