Go back
Voter registration rates exceeding 100%

Voter registration rates exceeding 100%

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
05 Dec 20

More registered voters than residences.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-judicial-watch-analysis-finds-353-u-s-counties-in-29-states-with-voter-registration-exceeding-100/

I want to thank kevcvs57 for inspiring me to create this thread and get out this vote fraud info. Thanks buddy!

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
05 Dec 20

@vivify said
Thread 187515
Barr worked for the CIA.
A little reminder.

https://www.democracynow.org/2018/3/12/as_ex_cia_head_admits_to

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20424
Clock
05 Dec 20
1 edit

@metal-brain said
More registered voters than residences.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-judicial-watch-analysis-finds-353-u-s-counties-in-29-states-with-voter-registration-exceeding-100/

I want to thank kevcvs57 for inspiring me to create this thread and get out this vote fraud info. Thanks buddy!
Report: New Judicial Watch analysis finds 353 counties in 29 states with voter registration over 100%

That helps. No evidence, tho, right dems????



"Nothing to see here, folks... move along"

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Dec 20

@metal-brain said
Barr worked for the CIA.
A little reminder.

https://www.democracynow.org/2018/3/12/as_ex_cia_head_admits_to
So?

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20424
Clock
05 Dec 20

@vivify said
So?
deep state

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Dec 20
1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
deep state
So Barr, who lied about the contents of the Mueller report to the public and committed a slew of corrupt acts to benefit Trump, suddenly turned and became the "deep state"?

Idiotic.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
05 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
05 Dec 20
2 edits

@earl-of-trumps said
Report: New Judicial Watch analysis finds 353 counties in 29 states with voter registration over 100%

That helps. No evidence, tho, right dems????



"Nothing to see here, folks... move along"
Another "self appointed" expert on the subject. If you folks in Trumpland have such rock solid evidence of voter fraud why can't you win any court cases with it?? Even the most Conservative of judges say your so called evidence isn't worth the paper it's printed on. 😏

What's your next conspiracy theory going to be? Are secret societies running the world from behind the scenes? Is the "deep state" coming to take yer shootin irons away? Are large orange frogs invading Cleveland?

Trump lost. It's over. Get a feakin life will ya!

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
05 Dec 20
1 edit

@metal-brain said
More registered voters than residences.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-judicial-watch-analysis-finds-353-u-s-counties-in-29-states-with-voter-registration-exceeding-100/

I want to thank kevcvs57 for inspiring me to create this thread and get out this vote fraud info. Thanks buddy!
This ridiculous "study" was debunked long ago; it uses a survey data which are polling type estimates and then acts like it is equivalent to Census data (which are actual counts). Of course, surveys have margins of error so they are not going to match:

"Experts we consulted cautioned that the figures recorded by Judicial Watch, which they claimed showed that counties have “ghost voters,” or more registered voters than the population of voting-eligible residents, was misleading. That underlying assumption, they said, was the result of making a “problematic” comparison between two different types of datasets.

“The American Community Survey is sample-based. It is not a census,” statistician Philip Stark, associated dean of mathematical and physical sciences at the University of California at Berkeley, told us in an email. “Its population estimates between decennial censuses are approximate; the approximation will be worse at the level of counties than at the level of states. Using the ACS to determine the number of eligible voters is problematic.”

"The intent of the ACS is to give public officials snapshots of communities in order to assess funding and services needed in those communities. Because the data is collected over a five-year period of time, comparing it to current voter registration amounts to an apples-to-oranges comparison, said D. Sunshine Hillygus, professor of political science at Duke University."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ghost-voters-in-29-states/

Judicial Watch's specific claims regarding eight counties in Iowa were massacred by its Secretary of State:

"Pate tweeted a link to the secretary of state’s website, for those who wanted to check the numbers. “The county population numbers you claim are way too low. Dallas County’s population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, is nearly 9,000+ more than you claim, and Johnson County’s is nearly 7,000 higher,” Pate tweeted. "

https://apnews.com/article/8437750124

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
05 Dec 20

@metal-brain said
More registered voters than residences.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/new-judicial-watch-analysis-finds-353-u-s-counties-in-29-states-with-voter-registration-exceeding-100/

I want to thank kevcvs57 for inspiring me to create this thread and get out this vote fraud info. Thanks buddy!
Of course there would be more voters than residences you utter clown. Give it up MB old Buddy, just step back from the issue, cry yourself to sleep and you’ll feel much better in the morning.
This is the one that got away but theres plenty more conspiracy fish in the sea.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
06 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
So?
The CIA has no respect for democracy abroad so why would you think they respect it domestically? Besides, they are taught to lie, cheat and steal by the CIA. Pompeo said so.

Speaking of Pompeo, he said Trump would serve a second term. Not sure why the other CIA man is saying the opposite. Maybe sucking up to his boss? Maybe he didn't get offered a position in the Biden administration like Krebs and Barr probably did.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
06 Dec 20
6 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
The CIA has no respect for democracy abroad so why would you think they respect it domestically? Besides, they are taught to lie, cheat and steal by the CIA. Pompeo said so.
So what? Bar lied constantly for Trump, starting immediately after he was hired and lied about the Mueller report. Why do you have a problem now?

You associate Barr with liars, thieves and cheats; why only now? Where was your outrage when he falsely represented the Mueller report? Or when Barr helped get Roger Stone's sentence reduced, a corrupt act that caused several prosecutors to resign in protest?

After being Trump's obedient lap dog for his entire tenure as AG, why is Barr a liar after *one* act of reporting something Trump doesn't like? You don't see your hypocrisy here?

What if Barr kept claiming election fraud: would he not be that lying, cheating thief you imply he is?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
06 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
So what? Bar lied constantly for Trump, starting immediately after he was hired and lied about the Mueller report. Why do you have a problem now?

You associate Barr with liars, thieves and cheats; why only now? Where was your outrage when he falsely represented the Mueller report? Or when Barr helped get Roger Stone's sentence reduced, a corrupt act that caused several ...[text shortened]... at if Barr kept claiming election fraud: would he not be that lying, cheating thief you imply he is?
So you admit Barr is a liar.
What was your point again?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22641
Clock
06 Dec 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
This ridiculous "study" was debunked long ago; it uses a survey data which are polling type estimates and then acts like it is equivalent to Census data (which are actual counts). Of course, surveys have margins of error so they are not going to match:

"Experts we consulted cautioned that the figures recorded by Judicial Watch, which they claimed showed that counties h ...[text shortened]... d Johnson County’s is nearly 7,000 higher,” Pate tweeted. "

https://apnews.com/article/8437750124
That snopes link does not say it was debunked or even wrong. It says unproven.

Snopes has discredited itself. It is not a reliable fact checking source.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.