127d
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThe late great Hannibal lecter would like a word.
Like these?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsq5V1NtvB0
127d
@wildgrass saidHahaha
The late great Hannibal lecter would like a word.
Oh man. The Maga movement trying to suggest they are not weird.
They’ve got their faces so far down a rabbit hole, with their arses sticking out, people are starting to use them to park bicycles.
127d
@shavixmir saidThat would be some mighty nasty cracker scat to get stuck in one's tire tread.
Hahaha
Oh man. The Maga movement trying to suggest they are not weird.
They’ve got their faces so far down a rabbit hole, with their arses sticking out, people are starting to use them to park bicycles.
127d
@Cliff-Mashburn saidAnything besides polemics?
Like these?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsq5V1NtvB0
127d
@Cliff-Mashburn saidIn other words, democrats want to desperately avoid talking about the policies of Prison Slavery Kamala. Come on Cliff, this is the debates forum. How many times have you seen people avoid a debate with ad hominem attacks? Personal attacks are to avoid talking about policies. The question is are the republicans stupid enough to fall for it and get into a who is more weird contest?
Like these?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsq5V1NtvB0
It is like pro wrestling. Carefully choreographed smack talk that does not include Trump calling her Prison Slavery Kamala just like calling Biden Racial Jungle Joe was not part of the act. So nice of Trump to go easy on Kamala and not call her Prison Slavery Kamala. Isn't Trump kind to her?
127d
@Metal-Brain saidSo this is a "debating" thread? What is the thesis to be debated (besides a polemic video)?
In other words, democrats want to desperately avoid talking about the policies of Prison Slavery Kamala. Come on Cliff, this is the debates forum. How many times have you seen people avoid a debate with ad hominem attacks? Personal attacks are to avoid talking about policies. The question is are the republicans stupid enough to fall for it and get into a who is more weird ...[text shortened]... nice of Trump to go easy on Kamala and not call her Prison Slavery Kamala. Isn't Trump kind to her?
Several topics would suggest themselves:
* Is it okay to use deregatory labels for the opponent?
* Does Walz something, he is not accepting t be done by the opponent?
* Should politics be about sontents? And what do recent ersults tell about that.
There could also be a thread about What fileds of polictics need work. And how can be worked on them?
127d
@Ponderable saidDemocrats do not want to talk about the issues because Prison Slavery Kamala is toast if they do. So Walz resorts to personal attacks instead. As if Kamala laughing like a hyena is not weird.
So this is a "debating" thread? What is the thesis to be debated (besides a polemic video)?
Several topics would suggest themselves:
* Is it okay to use deregatory labels for the opponent?
* Does Walz something, he is not accepting t be done by the opponent?
* Should politics be about sontents? And what do recent ersults tell about that.
There could also be a thread about What fileds of polictics need work. And how can be worked on them?
No, don't talk about the prison slavery that went on under my watch. Call them weird and hope they are as childish as we are so we can have a weirdness contest.
@Metal-Brain saidhttps://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-arpaio-timeline-20170801-story.html
Democrats do not want to talk about the issues because Prison Slavery Kamala is toast if they do. So Walz resorts to personal attacks instead. As if Kamala laughing like a hyena is not weird.
No, don't talk about the prison slavery that went on under my watch. Call them weird and hope they are as childish as we are so we can have a weirdness contest.
Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio who targeted and arrested Hispanics without due process. Arpaio put them in chain gangs and continued violating civil rights and racial profiling even after a judge told him to stop.
Trump pardoned a man who *actually* used "prison slavery". He will get destroyed if Kamala talks about "record".
127d
@vivify saidPrison slavery is perfectly constitutional. Read the 14th amendment.
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-arpaio-timeline-20170801-story.html
Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio who targeted and arrested Hispanics without due process. Arpaio put them in chain gangs and continued violating civil rights and racial profiling even after a judge told him to stop.
Trump pardoned not only pardoned a man who *actually* used "prison slavery" but said thi ...[text shortened]... very same man was "doing a good job".
Trump will get destroyed if Kamala talks about "record".
Alice Copper likes Arpaio too. Does that make him bad too?
Kamala's underling wanted to extend prison sentences to keep them slaves. That is not constitutional. That is just plain exploitation. And I'll bet a lot of them were black. Like Kamala's Marxist economist father said, Kamala has an Irish slave owner ancestor. Exploitation is in her bloodline.
127d
@Metal-Brain saidYou criticize "prison slavery" when talking about Kamala then say it's "perfectly Constitutional" for Trump?
Prison slavery is perfectly constitutional. Read the 14th amendment.
You're not bothered by this hypocrisy?
127d
@vivify saidStating a fact is not hypocrisy. Did you read the 14th amendment?
You criticize "prison slavery" when talking about Kamala then say it's "perfectly Constitutional" for Trump?
You're not bothered by this hypocrisy?
If someone wanted to keep you in prison for longer than your sentence would you like that? It is bad enough that slavery is still legal in the USA for convicts, but to exploit people by extending their slavery beyond their sentence is just deliberate exploitation.
How is it constitutional to keep people in prison longer to keep them slaves?
127d
@Metal-Brain saidPost a link.
If someone wanted to keep you in prison for longer than your sentence would you like that?