Go back
What could possibly go wrong

What could possibly go wrong

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@wildgrass said
You should start a petition to end funding for the Pentagon on the basis of it being useless.
For home defense? Almost accurate 🤔

We still need the Pentagon for other places though.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@wildgrass said
Oh, I retract my statement then.

Even if multiple developed countries invaded us, I'm pretty sure we could handle them even without the Pentagon's support.
He even offers that scenario in the video.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@vivify said
Not disputing that. But Puz just said "guns". That's it.
I said 300 million armed Americans prevent all invasions because no army in the entire world can deal with 300 million guerilla warfare Americans.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@vivify

The most famous Japanese quote regarding invading America is widely attributed to Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, who stated:

"You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

That quote has never been proven in writing to that general but even back after WW2 everyone knew you couldn't invade the USA because of the population owning so much firepower.

He likely said it but never wrote it. The Japanese back then we're very honorable and a man with that high of a position wouldn't lie about an unimportant quote about the USA.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
@vivify

Are we still in your make believe lands that have the USA without air force and tanks and all the other crap?

Listen real close doofus.
Go watch any videos about why invading the USA isn't possible.

They always say, 300 million armed Americans prevents it.

Now shut the hell up about it because the USA will be here for a long time. Go bite your pillow.
Unless you have a president that will invite them in.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
The video shows how even without a military, the USA cannot be invaded.

It's worth the watch. Very educational about geography and historical examples etc.

He leaves the 300 million armed civilians until the end.
Is Corporal "Bonespurs" Trump going to lead the troops?

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
For home defense? Almost accurate 🤔

We still need the Pentagon for other places though.
A trillion dollars worth per annum? We need that? For what?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@Suzianne said
Unless you have a president that will invite them in.
You're talking about Biden and the illegals he let in?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@Suzianne said
Is Corporal "Bonespurs" Trump going to lead the troops?
General Hegseth will lead the troops for President Vance obviously duh 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@wildgrass said
A trillion dollars worth per annum? We need that? For what?
Your problem is with the government hiring non government companies to make weapons and munitions and paying made up, out of this world prices, I agree, it's stupid.

I agree but what can you do right?

4 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
Your problem is with the government hiring non government companies to make weapons and munitions and paying made up, out of this world prices, I agree, it's stupid.

I agree but what can you do right?
No. My problem is the trillion in unnecessary spending. What you can do is vote for the candidate who vows to cut spending on this ridiculous-ness.

Edit, this trillion in tax spending every year for no reason does not even account for the fact that we as a society take care of our vets after completing service. They sacrifice and they deserve it. But if we are saying that the sacrifice is unnecessary, then it starts sounding A LOT like a welfare program, a welfare program that exceeds SNAP and actual welfare by orders of magnitude.

🤔

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@wildgrass

I can't vote lol I'm Canadian.
I enjoy the safety of living next to the strongest country in the world.
God bless Canada and the USA

The problem with spending cuts is it's never just that easy.
The Democrats will say cut spending on war! ...and the fine print says 'the money saved will go to everyone but white people' or some other ridiculous try.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
Just from watching the news over the last decade I've noticed more plots have been foiled before they could cause damage.

That's a good network of spies, informants and technology.

Less manpower is needed and all government agencies have always had a problem with too many people getting paid for essentially nothing.

You don't even like the USA so why are you worried ...[text shortened]... ps out of Europe until those countries make public statements backing the USA in every way possible.
Why don't you just admit you hate the US?