Go back
What did the Justices do wrong?

What did the Justices do wrong?

Debates


@suzianne said
As I've said here before, they are merely doing the job they were hired to do.

Did anyone expect anything different?
Maybe Thomas, a black man, knows black woman have a very large amount of abortions and he's trying to stop that to increase the black population 🤷

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
I dont usually hahahahahahah but this takes the cake. The Marauder is saying that Supreme Court Justices 'do not understand the political philosophy ......
Stupid people often laugh at stuff they don't understand.

It's usually called "saving face".


@suzianne said
Stupid people often laugh at stuff they don't understand.

It's usually called "saving face".
VP Harris?

So true.


@ron-desantis said
Maybe Thomas, a black man, knows black woman have a very large amount of abortions and he's trying to stop that to increase the black population 🤷
Just when I think you can't get any more stupid....

Vote Up
Vote Down

🤣

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ron-desantis said
Keep bringing them over here and you'll have exactly that.
Can we just deport all the Republicans, then?


@ron-desantis said
Maybe Thomas, a black man, knows black woman have a very large amount of abortions and he's trying to stop that to increase the black population 🤷
Well, if he wanted to "increase the black population" he could have done his part and married a Black woman.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
No, I said Mott doesn't.

These SCOTUS justices probably do understand it; they just oppose it.
LOL...YOU are the one that doesnt understand


@no1marauder said
Well, if he wanted to "increase the black population" he could have done his part and married a Black woman.
So racist.
I can't believe you just said that. 😔


@ron-desantis said
So racist.
I can't believe you just said that. 😔
A joke in response to your stupid comment.


😉


@averagejoe1 said
We can all stipulate the role of the justices as same pertains to the Constitution. That is what they did in Roe, resulting in their findings and decision.
So, very specifically, why are the people who don't work picketing for bounties, ....what was the justices' offense to warrant bounties?
I am not being glib. Truly, what is the deal? Assuming that everyon ...[text shortened]... hat is. Those who want to change the law, that is fine, but I am talking about today, this decision.
Amazingly, lots of people can find the right to terminate a pregnancy in the US Bill of Rights (written in the 18th century) but cannot find the right to keep and bear arms.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
You compare the US with the Middle-East Islamic states of pain and torture?
Well at least we don't stone women to death for being raped or make them wear horse-blankets from head to toe, with a mesh mask over their face, because they are like, so unclean and evil and stuff..
He only mentioned abortions ya' idiot...
Stoned to death.....What a maroon.


@techsouth said
Amazingly, lots of people can find the right to terminate a pregnancy in the US Bill of Rights (written in the 18th century) but cannot find the right to keep and bear arms.
''......a well regulated militia......''
is that similar to a lone wolf gunman
running amok in our schools and markets with an AR-15...............?
Yeah, same exact thing.

2 edits

@techsouth said
Amazingly, lots of people can find the right to terminate a pregnancy in the US Bill of Rights (written in the 18th century) but cannot find the right to keep and bear arms.
Abortions were common in the 18th Century as were restrictions on open carrying of firearms except in militia service.

"During the colonial period, the legality of abortion varied from colony to colony and reflected the attitude of the European country which controlled the specific colony. In the British colonies abortions were legal if they were performed prior to quickening."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10297561/

" most colonies adopted common law as it had been interpreted in the colonies prior to independence, including the ban on traveling armed in populated areas. Thus, there was no general right of armed travel when the Second Amendment was adopted, and certainly no right to travel with concealed weapons."

"Nonetheless, by the end of the century [the 18th-no1], prohibiting public carry was the legal norm, not the exception."

https://theconversation.com/[WORD TOO LONG].

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.