What influenced the election more?

We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?

Which was worse and why?

Originally posted by whodey
We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?

CNN didn't, Donna Brazile did. So what?

Originally posted by HandyAndy
CNN didn't, Donna Brazile did. So what?

So we have proof that Hillary is corrupt just as is the DNC.

Originally posted by HandyAndy
CNN didn't, Donna Brazile did. So what?

So arming an opponent before a debate as to what the debate questions will be is not influencing an election?

It seems to me that Dims are just fine with manipulating election results so long as they are the ones doing it.

Originally posted by whodey
So arming an opponent before a debate as to what the debate questions will be is not influencing an election?

It seems to me that Dims are just fine with manipulating election results so long as they are the ones doing it.

Good point. Funny how those who would claim to ne true Americans but liberal are exposed in situations like this.

Originally posted by whodey
So arming an opponent before a debate as to what the debate questions will be is not influencing an election?

It seems to me that Dims are just fine with manipulating election results so long as they are the ones doing it.

Why are you continuing to rag on about this? You buddy, asssswipe won, so now you have a narcissistic paranoid sociopath president and THAT doesn't worry you? He is a puppet of Putin, you should know that. You figure no matter what, he's OUR assshole?

Originally posted by sonhouse
Why are you continuing to rag on about this? You buddy, asssswipe won, so now you have a narcissistic paranoid sociopath president and THAT doesn't worry you? He is a puppet of Putin, you should know that. You figure no matter what, he's OUR assshole?

Trump is not my buddy. I'm merely trying to splain your own Dim hypocrisy to you and why you lost the election.

I think had Trump lost the election he would have let out a greater stink than Hillary and Jill Stein put together.

Neither side gives a damn about democracy, only obtaining power. And the reason one party can't hold power very long is the same reason.

Originally posted by Eladar
Good point. Funny how those who would claim to ne true Americans but liberal are exposed in situations like this.

Democrats do it. Republicans do it. Get over it.

Originally posted by whodey
We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?

Which was worse and why?

Clinton knowing of a single primary (not against Trump as you falsely claim) debate question didn't help her (she won the primary with a sizable lead anyway) - and indeed it hurt her when it was leaked.

The Russian hacks helped the GOP and the alt-reich more effectively swiftboat Clinton and almost certainly made a decisive impact on the election esp. given how close the election was.

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Democrats do it. Republicans do it. Get over it.

If a Republican gets caught doing it tge Reoublican loses face and loses office. If Democrats do it, nobody cares.

Originally posted by whodey
We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?

Which was worse and why?

The latter, they were caught with their pants down. But what decided the election even more, was just letting Libtards speak. Their own words exposed their anger and hatred and twisted minds.

WASHINGTON – Scathing criticism of President Obama’s decision to expel 35 Russian diplomats is pouring in, with the perhaps curious exception of the leaders of the Republican establishment.

A senior congressional staff member told WND, “What’s amazing to me is how the Obama administration is pursuing a scorched earth policy and attempting to destroy our international relationships across the spectrum from Russia to Israel on their way out the door.”
Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va.

The aide noted the U.K. and Australia “are openly at odds with them.”

“It’s a mess – and what’s worse, it’s an unnecessary one,” the top staffer concluded.

Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va., said Obama “seems intent on setting the world on fire the month before he leaves office.”

“First he betrays our ally Israel, and is now taking retaliatory action against Russia all within a week,” the congressman continued.

“And he’s doing this without any consultation with Congress, that has yet to see a promised report providing proof that Russia interfered in our election. So, why now?”

http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/obama-setting-the-world-on-fire-on-way-out-the-door/

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Clinton knowing of a single primary (not against Trump as you falsely claim) debate question didn't help her (she won the primary with a sizable lead anyway) - and indeed it hurt her when it was leaked.

The Russian hacks helped the GOP and the alt-reich more effectively swiftboat Clinton and almost certainly made a decisive impact on the election esp. given how close the election was.

The Russian hacks...
You cite that with such authority.
Is this on the basis of what you've heard from the desperate-to-distract outgoing president, the mouthpiece MSM, or...?
This is a sincere inquiry: I've heard countless sources claiming some nebulous and oh-so-nefarious hacking performed by Russia, but not a single source has once cited any specifics or even proof of said hacking.
In fact, they're not even saying what got hacked.
Votes?
Results?
Fake news?
How exactly did Russia hack the election?

Despite this lack of established facts to support the vague charge--- or even specific claims thereof--- let's just assume the charge is factual.
Is the leadership of the US really that arrogant and cock sure of its citizens' collective amnesia regarding our aggressive interventions in other sovereign states over the last five decades?
Somehow NOW this type of whatever-it-is-they-allegedly did behavior is unethical, grounds for sanctions and/or war?

Ha!

Originally posted by whodey
We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?

Which was worse and why?

Since you know that the accusation is that Donna Brazile gave one or perhaps a few more debate questions to the Hillary campaign before a March debate with Bernie Sanders, you already know the answer and also know that you are lying as usual. She trounced Trump at the debates because he conducted himself like a borderline lunatic not because of any non-existent leaking of debate questions.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Since you know that the accusation is that Donna Brazile gave one or perhaps a few more debate questions to the Hillary campaign before a March debate with Bernie Sanders, you already know the answer and also know that you are lying as usual. She trounced Trump at the debates because he conducted himself like a borderline lunatic not because of any non-existent leaking of debate questions.

Your subjectivity notwithstanding, any foreknowledge of the questions prior to the debate ought to have been immediate removal and dismissal from the same.
Those are the rules, technically.
But this wasn't a scored event, was it?
The damage she did to herself and her alleged integrity--- culminating in the severe beating she took at the polls--- were enough of a loss to ensure the country wouldn't be forced to suffer under her criminal "leadership" for the next four years.
You know when they say 'not qualified to be a dog catcher'?
That's her, exactly.
Candidly, I would have voted for 'none of the above' before voting for her cheating, lying, deceitful ass.
She is an abscessed oozing pimple on the country's ass, and the furthest we can remove her from any influence is still not far away enough.

Reprehensible.