Originally posted by no1marauder This idiotic rant doesn't change any facts, so my original post remains unrefuted.
Perhaps in the interest of transparency, the RNC would be willing to make public all e-mails sent and received from its officials. Maybe you should be shouting for that.
They don't seem to be stupid enough to keep their lying crap off their own private servers.
I had no idea that "facts" mean anything to you since you don't think Hilary ever lied.
Your reputation here has been destroyed by your partisan allegiance for a ditz like Hillary.
Originally posted by whodey They don't seem to be stupid enough to keep their lying crap off their own private servers.
I had no idea that "facts" mean anything to you since you don't think Hilary ever lied.
Your reputation here has been destroyed by your partisan allegiance for a ditz like Hillary.
Speaking of lying ........................
No matter how many times you keep claiming what you do in the second and third sentences here, it remains a deliberate and knowing falsehood. You miserably failed to establish any specific instance of Hillary lying as regards the e-mail molehill, but I certainly never stated categorically that Hillary never lied. And since pretty much everyone here who pays the slightest attention knows I did not vote for HRC and indeed have not voted for any Democratic candidate for any position above my local Congressman for decades, your claims of my partisanship are just another deliberate and knowing untruth on your part.
I'll put my "reputation" on this site, for whatever that is worth, against yours any day.
Originally posted by no1marauder Speaking of lying ........................
No matter how many times you keep claiming what you do in the second and third sentences here, it remains a deliberate and knowing falsehood. You miserably failed to establish any specific instance of Hillary lying as regards the e-mail molehill, but I certainly never stated categorically that Hillary never l ...[text shortened]... rt.
I'll put my "reputation" on this site, for whatever that is worth, against yours any day.
What are you babbling about? It has been proven that Hillary was given debate questions and you still refuse to admit she cheated.
Originally posted by whodey What are you babbling about? It has been proven that Hillary was given debate questions and you still refuse to admit she cheated.
Go smoke some more reefer.
I suggest you read what your original accusation in the OP was and then read my response to it. You'll find your last post is a non sequitur; what you claimed is that (in effect) Donna Brazille giving HRC's campaign one or perhaps more debate questions for a March debate against Bernie Sanders somehow hurt Trump in the debates in October. Since that is idiotic nonsense, I called you on it. And since you are incapable of logically refuting that call-out you are reverting to bizarre twists and turns having nothing to do with your original claim and my response to it.
Originally posted by no1marauder I suggest you read what your original accusation in the OP was and then read my response to it. You'll find your last post is a non sequitur; what you claimed is that (in effect) Donna Brazille giving HRC's campaign one or perhaps more debate questions for a March debate against Bernie Sanders somehow hurt Trump in the debates in October. Since that is i ...[text shortened]... to bizarre twists and turns having nothing to do with your original claim and my response to it.
So you are suggesting that if Hillary was only given one debate question that would not influence the election?
Originally posted by whodey So you are suggesting that if Hillary was only given one debate question that would not influence the election?
Why then did she give it?
One more time:
whodey: We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was(sic) of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?
Explain how Brazile giving Hillary's campaign debate questions for a March debate with Sanders in March could help her "trounce Trump" in debates held in October?
Brazile was suspended from CNN in July when she accepted a post in the DNC leadership long before the Trump-Hillary debates. Her contract was then terminated in October when the alleged misconduct in March took place (she still denies it BTW).http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/31/media/donna-brazile-cnn-resignation/index.html
Originally posted by whodey We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates so that she could trounce Trump?
Which was worse and why?
Neither of these was nearly as consequential as the vast amount of voter suppression the Republican Party got away with in this election.
Your question as it stands, though, is ridiculous. One debate question being leaked out had next to zero impact on what happened. Clearly, Russian involvement had more impact than that.
But they both pale beside the fact that Republican elections officials removed millions of minority voters from the rolls for no reason other than they were minorities, likely to vote Democratic.
Removed
Joined
08 Dec '04
Moves
100919
02 Jan '17 23:57
Originally posted by Suzianne Neither of these was nearly as consequential as the vast amount of voter suppression the Republican Party got away with in this election.
Your question as it stands, though, is ridiculous. One debate question being leaked out had next to zero impact on what happened. Clearly, Russian involvement had more impact than that.
But they both pale beside t ...[text shortened]... voters from the rolls for no reason other than they were minorities, likely to vote Democratic.
This is the only time they have been caught, let's remember that.
whodey: We have all heard that the Russians interfered with the election results by revealing the secret e-mails of Hillary and the DNC, but was(sic) of CNN giving Hillary the debate questions before the debates [b]so that she could trounce Trump?
Explain how Brazile giving Hillary's campaign debate questions for a March debate ...[text shortened]... ll denies it BTW).http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/31/media/donna-brazile-cnn-resignation/index.html[/b]
Do you seriously think Trump could have beaten Sanders? 🙄
Dims have been desperate for some time to go full socialist.
Originally posted by Suzianne Neither of these was nearly as consequential as the vast amount of voter suppression the Republican Party got away with in this election.
Your question as it stands, though, is ridiculous. One debate question being leaked out had next to zero impact on what happened. Clearly, Russian involvement had more impact than that.
But they both pale beside t ...[text shortened]... voters from the rolls for no reason other than they were minorities, likely to vote Democratic.
Both sides try to "fix" elections. It's what they do. Neither side really believes in democracy, just abject power.
What influenced the election more?
02 Jan '17 22:25
Back to Top