Go back
What is a sport?

What is a sport?

Debates

a
Andrew Mannion

Melbourne, Australia

Joined
17 Feb 04
Moves
54003
Clock
27 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just reading some of the posts about chess in the Olympics, and it got me thinking. I've always thought events (such as gymnastics, surfing, ice skating, etc.) where the performance was based on a judgement are not sports. Sports are those events where there are clear results - someone is faster, stronger, etc.
Now, I don't have a bias against the former - in fact, I love surfing myself.
I just can't see how you can justify them as sports - and in the case of gymnastics or diving foir example, Olympic sports.

Any thoughts?

T

Joined
27 Mar 05
Moves
88
Clock
27 Sep 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

In my opinion, a 'sport', in addition to being competitive and requiring special athletic abilities, should also involve a direct head-to-head competition between the competitors in which the performance of one competitor directly affects or influences the performance of the other.

In football, for instance, you have an offensive team trying to score, and a defensive team trying to prevent a score... that's direct, head-to-head competition on the same field at the same time.

Also, in a sport, a competitor/team should have their own destiny in their own hands, when it comes to the outcome of the competition... i.e. if the Falcons don't play well and don't match the intensity of the Saints, they'll probably lose.

In events such as figure skating, gymnastics, surfing, or even cheerleading, the teams (or individuals) really have no control over the outcome of the competition... they go out their and perform as individuals, the rest is up to the judges. There's no one else out there that is physically trying to prevent them from performing their tasks... likewise, they can't do anything about affecting the performance of OTHER teams or individuals in these types of events...

Of course, I think we can all agree that surfing, figure skating and gymnastics do require incredible amounts of dedication, discipline, athletic ability, etc. in order to become world class (or even just to be good at it). But I would put these types of events more in the "competition" category than a true "sport".

stratosph3R3
Christi evangelista

Joined
16 Sep 05
Moves
99234
Clock
27 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

The question of whether or not chess was a sport was raised in another thread in the Help Forum and I made the comment thatthat the line between sports and games, and that of exercise and play is nebulus. Games are often redefined as sports when they involve particularly skilled participants, which gives them appeal to non-participants.

Similarly, play is usually understood as less purposeful activity, but can become more like a game or sport as it conforms more to external rules or patterns of behaviour. Exercise or training is action to develop skill or ability, and may be a forerunner of both sport and games.

I suppose if I were to look for characteristics that define a sport I would consider the following:

1) The exercise of a useful skill in a recreational manner (that is not related to a vocation). This can be broken down into physical sports, that use characteristics such as strength, stamina, speed, dexterity and other skills and other recreational pursuits that use more cerebral skills.

2) It conforms to a set of rules for the activity while aiming to attain excellence. By excellence I am referring is ameasurement against previous benchmarks, time measurements, performance, world records, etc.

t

Joined
13 Oct 05
Moves
12505
Clock
27 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STRATOSPH3R3
The question of whether or not chess was a sport was raised in another thread in the Help Forum and I made the comment thatthat the line between sports and games, and that of exercise and play is nebulus. Games are often redefined as sports when they involve particularly skilled participants, which gives them appeal to non-participants.

Similarly, p ...[text shortened]... is ameasurement against previous benchmarks, time measurements, performance, world records, etc.
I think a sport needs to be competitive and have a physical component. The winning and losing must be decided on the grounds of the competitors' superior or inferior acomplishment of that physical component. The winner in chess is not decided on the physical component, therefore i don't think it's a sport. It's just a game. Tiddlewinks is a sport though.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
27 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

All 'judged' sports should be eliminated from the olympics

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.