Go back
What is definition of bad people, bad guys, to you?

What is definition of bad people, bad guys, to you?

Debates


Would be interesting. Of course, there will definitely be different definitions from liberals than from conservatives.


Simple. People that don't leave others in peace. Bullies, thieves, murderers, thugs etc.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Would be interesting. Of course, there will definitely be different definitions from liberals than from conservatives.
My wife says there are no bad people, just people who sometimes do bad things.


@averagejoe1 said
Would be interesting. Of course, there will definitely be different definitions from liberals than from conservatives.
paranoid we think you're a bad person?

it's not paranoia. we do think you're absolutely wretched


@zahlanzi said
paranoid we think you're a bad person?

it's not paranoia. we do think you're absolutely wretched
We? You mention 'we' twice, and Wolf just answered what his wife thinks. A definite sign of mob-trend here, what is it with liberal people? And in lib style, you rephrase my question by asking. am I speaking of myself as being a bad person? Don't think so. Whew

So, everyone, we do not know what 2 liberal posters think about the question, one getting behind his wife (who says no one is bad ... 🙄... 😳), and one who changes the question while hiding behind 'we', apparently for support.

I hereby officially declare that the libs are in a spiral and going maniacal, as I predicted they would , being the same person who predicted SCOTUS would not let us see tax returns, Mueller would lose, etc. I also predict beaucoup electoral votes for Trump, but don't want to waste that prediction this far out!

Whew. Liberals. Can we get a straight answer in here please?


@averagejoe1 said
We? You mention 'we' twice,
The first time he uses "we" is undoubtedly correct as your thread title is
obviously using "you" as the 2nd person plural and "we" is therefore appropriate.

The second time he uses "we" is correct if he knows of at least one other
who shares his opinion of you. I think it safe to say that that is correct.

So really ... what is your problem?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
The first time he uses "we" is undoubtedly correct as your thread title is
obviously using "you" as the 2nd person plural and "we" is therefore appropriate.

The second time he uses "we" is correct if he knows of at least one other
who shares his opinion of you. I think it safe to say that that is correct.

So really ... what is your problem?
Frankly that is an acceptable disection of the we response, but seems a lib could break off into independent-speak just for an adventure every now and then.

Zahlanzi did say ‘we dont like Averagejoe1’, speaking for all libs, i guess. (Or was he saying He and Wolf? See? It’s confusing). Why not like me? All I do is try to make the position of the other side, to keep it interesting, or otherwise you would all just be hashing out the same ole agreeable stuff. And you would all be agreeing Biden and his sociaiist lieutenants would easily win. No fun. You need a contrarian!


@averagejoe1 said
We? You mention 'we' twice, and Wolf just answered what his wife thinks. A definite sign of mob-trend here, what is it with liberal people? And in lib style, you rephrase my question by asking. am I speaking of myself as being a bad person? Don't think so. Whew

So, everyone, we do not know what 2 liberal posters think about the question, one getting behind his wif ...[text shortened]... aste that prediction this far out!

Whew. Liberals. Can we get a straight answer in here please?
"we" as people here. I don't know if you have the balls to be this cartoonish ashole character in real life. Maybe you have enough social awareness to realize the stuff you say here would make most social groups shun you.

"am I speaking of myself as being a bad person? "
speaking of yourself as being a bad person and being worried others perceive you as a bad person are two very different things.

Of course you don't think you are a bad person. You would maybe try to be a better human being if you did (unless you're a complete sociopath). But maybe you are indeed worried others perceive you as such. And you're right. We absolutely do. If you aren't worried about that then you can add being oblivious to being a bad person.


"and one who changes the question while hiding behind 'we', apparently for support."
i am confident enough to say that most people here think you are a bad person. I am not alone thinking that.


"I hereby officially declare that the libs are in a spiral and going maniacal, as I predicted they would , being the same person who predicted SCOTUS would not let us see tax returns, Mueller would lose, etc. I also predict beaucoup electoral votes for Trump, but don't want to waste that prediction this far out! "
Aaaaand the rambling emerges.

"Whew. Liberals. Can we get a straight answer in here please?"
I am not interested in debating you. I have absolutely no respect for you. I just saw a cry for attention and an implied concern people here don't like you and just wanted to confirm that indeed, people don't like you.

1 edit

People who hurt animals are bad.
People who hurt kids are bad.


@averagejoe1 said


Whew. Liberals. Can we get a straight answer in here please?
Sure, you are despicable and should be hanged on a meat hook through your chest.

Too bad I am not a liberal though.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@e4e5f4d5 said
People who hurt animals are bad.
And animals that hurt people who hurt animals are good.
Wolves are good. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

LoL true

3 edits

@averagejoe1 said
Would be interesting. Of course, there will definitely be different definitions from liberals than from conservatives.
Those who knowingly harm others, of course, are "bad"; but I would include people who knowingly support people who harm others as "bad people".

If you support someone who says he'd do "worse than waterboarding" in regards to torturing suspects, that would make you a "bad" person. If you support someone who says he'd kill the families of suspected terrorists, that would make you "bad". If you support someone who scammed people with a fake "university", that would make you a "bad" person. If you support someone who's been proven to be corrupt and a frequent liar, that would make you "bad".

Being "bad" isn't just about the harm you do directly but about what harm you allow to happen by the people you associate with and support...or the harm you allow through your silence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.

Albert Einstein


@e4e5f4d5 said
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.

Albert Einstein
I could agree entirely with that quote if he had said:
The world is a dangerous place to live because of the people who are evil and because of the people who don't do anything about it.