Every country would have no reason for war wouldn't they?
Countries could still have their own identity, just like counties or towns have. Everyone would be free to travell accross from one to another no passport controls.
Tax payers could earn points for each of the months that they've paid into the system and use those points when they need them, like to use the NHS (which in my utpoia would be accross the globe).
What do you think? 🙂
Originally posted by yo its meThat would be nice, however, we have too many who want power so it will never happen.
Every country would have no reason for war wouldn't they?
Countries could still have their own identity, just like counties or towns have. Everyone would be free to travell accross from one to another no passport controls.
Tax payers could earn points for each of the months that they've paid into the system and use those points when they need them, like to use the NHS (which in my utpoia would be accross the globe).
What do you think? 🙂
I would, however, like to ask you what rights would eveyone have if this were so?
Originally posted by pritybettaRights to land you mean?
what rights would eveyone have if this were so?
Or reasurces off the land?
Umm both are the same I guess, and a hard question to answer.
The govenments themselves would be in charge of spending the taxes on keeping the place safe. They'd have no right to the land.
Most land is already owned by someone I think- but that is part of the problem.
Umm- any ideas?
Originally posted by yo its meWell, the land should be owned by the people living on it same as the resources. But I was more interested in rights people would have that pertain to their lives. Like would they have the right to self defence, or speach, or privacy?
Rights to land you mean?
Or reasurces off the land?
Umm both are the same I guess, and a hard question to answer.
The govenments themselves would be in charge of spending the taxes on keeping the place safe. They'd have no right to the land.
Most land is already owned by someone I think- but that is part of the problem.
Umm- any ideas?
I would also like to address the problem of a One World Government. This would mean the government can do what ever they want and the people would have to accept it. It would make the people slaves wouldn't you think? Especially if they are not allowed to have weapons.
Originally posted by pritybettaWould that work? I'm not sure some people live in flats and some in big houses. Some are still fighting for what they live on becasue of their religious beliefs.
Well, the land should be owned by the people living on it same as the resources. But I was more interested in rights people would have that pertain to their lives. Like would they have the right to self defence, or speach, or privacy?
I would also like to address the problem of a One World Government. This would mean the government can do what ever the ...[text shortened]... make the people slaves wouldn't you think? Especially if they are not allowed to have weapons.
Slaves? Well no I don't they'd just have to pick a world govenment that all agreed on. Actually I think it would work better if each counrty kept their own govenment but each govenment was only reasponsable for the safty of that counrty, like safe roads, purposful schools, prisons that worked (I envisage they'd be more like school, giving the inmates a new way of thinking).
No weapons, Yes that would be great.
No religions -that I'm not sure about.
Originally posted by pritybettaThere is a human rights that was written up a while ago, I think keeping to that would be great. It basically says you have a right to be equal on every level, to be treated with respect. It's common sense I'm sure but I guess that would eb the rules of the world! 😵
I was more interested in rights people would have that pertain to their lives. Like would they have the right to self defence, or speach, or privacy?
Originally posted by yo its meDunno about 1st come 1st served.
Yes that is the best solution, you're right. If you work on it then you could keep what you grow, or mine or so but first come first served on the use of it. Yes?
People can then just grab more than they need.
But, if everyone has a fair share, there's no reason why you can't keep what you produce from the bit of land you live on.
- Joined
- 29 Aug 06
- Moves
- 6850
1 edit
Originally posted by yo its meNo possessions.
Would that work? I'm not sure some people live in flats and some in big houses. Some are still fighting for what they live on becasue of their religious beliefs.
Slaves? Well no I don't they'd just have to pick a world govenment that all agreed on. Actually I think it would work better if each counrty kept their own govenment but each govenment was only inking).
No weapons, Yes that would be great.
No religions -that I'm not sure about.
Nothing to kill or die for.
One might say your a dreamer...
but it looks like you're not the only one. Rather there are three of you.
1 edit
Originally posted by yo its meNo weapons means no meat, no hunting, no protection against a rapist or other predators, human or animal.
Would that work? I'm not sure some people live in flats and some in big houses. Some are still fighting for what they live on becasue of their religious beliefs.
Slaves? Well no I don't they'd just have to pick a world govenment that all agreed on. Actually I think it would work better if each counrty kept their own govenment but each govenment was only inking).
No weapons, Yes that would be great.
No religions -that I'm not sure about.
And I don't believe we could have a world government that everyone can agree on. That is one reason why we have problems today.
No one owning land could be a good thing, however, the American Indians didn't think they 'owned' the land but they waded war against each other for hunting territories. If one tribe hunted too close to another, it would take away the food for the other tribe.
I also do not like your ideas, they seem to be too much of a communist government to me.
Originally posted by pritybettaCommunisim is a great idea it's a real shame it dosen't work.
No weapons means no meat, no hunting, no protection against a rapist or other predators, human or animal.
And I don't believe we could have a world government that everyone can agree on. That is one reason why we have problems today.
No one owning land could be a good thing, however, the American Indians didn't think they 'owned' the land but they w ...[text shortened]...
I also do not like your ideas, they seem to be too much of a communist government to me.
I didn't make myself clear about the weapons, I ment weapons of war, there'd be no need for them.
Yes the buffolo moved about then, they'd not be doing that now that we are all so crowded. I'm not sure how the land thing would work, as you say if no one owned it then everyone owns it and so then there are fights. People would push boarders between homes planting more and more to sell in exchange for other things and that's why I want rid of boarders.
Originally posted by yo its meThe gangstas take over.
Every country would have no reason for war wouldn't they?
Countries could still have their own identity, just like counties or towns have. Everyone would be free to travell accross from one to another no passport controls.
Tax payers could earn points for each of the months that they've paid into the system and use those points when they need them, like to use the NHS (which in my utpoia would be accross the globe).
What do you think? 🙂
Originally posted by pritybettaWell, the land should be owned by the people living on it same as the resources.
Well, the land should be owned by the people living on it same as the resources. But I was more interested in rights people would have that pertain to their lives. Like would they have the right to self defence, or speach, or privacy?
I would also like to address the problem of a One World Government. This would mean the government can do what ever the ...[text shortened]... make the people slaves wouldn't you think? Especially if they are not allowed to have weapons.
I didn't know you were a communist.