@wildgrass saidTrump pretended he didn't remember Maxwell. When will Jimmy Kimmel be allowed to make fun of Trump for it?
By not saying no, she implicitly says that yes there is evidence supporting the witness testimony of Trump's involvement and likely others. She was lobbed a softball question here.
https://rumble.com/v706nig-trump-feigns-ignorance-about-ghislaine-maxwell-w-ian-carroll.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
@Metal-Brain saidUH? WTF are you talking about?
American support for UH is more than 60%. Do math much?
I'm talking about votes to get bills passed, you idiot.
"American support" doesn't pass bills. Trump's OBBB was underwater in American support.
@Metal-Brain saidWhat America wants doesn't pass bills, you fool.
Doesn't matter. I asked you what percentage of Americans want UH. Answer the question.
@Suzianne saidIt's interesting because trump is a likely client but what about all the other clients? Epstein is known to have trafficked over 1,000 women. He had a whole infrastructure and employees and bank records all exist. What is the problem here? Can't they hide trump but at least go after the others?
Including her boss, of course.
@wildgrass saidThey have put themselves in a hole.
It's interesting because trump is a likely client but what about all the other clients? Epstein is known to have trafficked over 1,000 women. He had a whole infrastructure and employees and bank records all exist. What is the problem here? Can't they hide trump but at least go after the others?
They can't prove Epstein is guilty while simultaneously ignoring his connection to Trump. Questions get asked. If there's one thing Republicans hate, it's playing defense. They'd rather pretend nothing happened.
@wildgrass saidThe FBI had credible evidence of Epstein's under-age sex trafficking racket during the presidency of George Bush (the Lesser). Epstein was given a sweet deal, which included a no-prosecution agreement for his unnamed co-conspirators and clients. That was when the files should have been released. This cover-up has long history ...
It's interesting because trump is a likely client but what about all the other clients? Epstein is known to have trafficked over 1,000 women. He had a whole infrastructure and employees and bank records all exist. What is the problem here? Can't they hide trump but at least go after the others?
2 edits
@moonbus saidYah that seems a crime in itself for prosecutors to absolve the crimes of others outside a transparent legal process.
The FBI had credible evidence of Epstein's under-age sex trafficking racket during the presidency of George Bush (the Lesser). Epstein was given a sweet deal, which included a no-prosecution agreement for his unnamed co-conspirators and clients. That was when the files should have been released. This cover-up has long history ...
It still amazes me that the Attorney General was asked if there are pictures of trump with half naked girls (which has been confirmed by witnesses), and instead of saying "no" she smeared the question asker.
Why not just say no,? Unless.
@wildgrass saidThis cover-up has a long future, too.
Yah that seems a crime in itself for prosecutors to absolve the crimes of others outside a transparent legal process.
It still amazes me that the Attorney General was asked if there are pictures of trump with half naked girls (which has been confirmed by witnesses), and instead of saying "no" she smeared the question asker.
Why not just say no,? Unless.
@moonbus saidMaybe Prince Andrew can shed some light on it... he'll be asked to testify.
This cover-up has a long future, too.
Key sentence here ends with "... once the government ends the shutdown."
Maybe there's truth to the idea that the shutdown was designed to delay releasing Epstein file evidence.
https://www.thetimes.com/us/american-politics/article/congress-epstein-files-prince-andrew-marjorie-taylor-greene-fst9gpbn8
@wildgrass saidThe Andrew formerly known as Prince ...
Maybe Prince Andrew can shed some light on it... he'll be asked to testify.
Key sentence here ends with "... once the government ends the shutdown."
Maybe there's truth to the idea that the shutdown was designed to delay releasing Epstein file evidence.
https://www.thetimes.com/us/american-politics/article/congress-epstein-files-prince-andrew-marjorie-taylor-greene-fst9gpbn8
will refuse to testify. Count on it. Congress may eventually issue a subpoena, but cannot enforce it in Andrew's case.
@moonbus saidId think he could at least explain some things. He already lost his reputation and dignity and royal title over the assumption of a relationship with Epsteins girls, and he's getting old. There isn't much downside to just admitting to it. Take some pedos down with you.
The Andrew formerly known as Prince ...
will refuse to testify. Count on it. Congress may eventually issue a subpoena, but cannot enforce it in Andrew's case.