Go back
Where did Epstein evidence go?

Where did Epstein evidence go?

Debates


@wildgrass said
Id think he could at least explain some things. He already lost his reputation and dignity and royal title over the assumption of a relationship with Epsteins girls, and he's getting old. There isn't much downside to just admitting to it. Take some pedos down with you.
The refusal of the govt. at any level to release the suspect list is damning; it strongly suggests that a cover-up has been going on at very high levels for a very long time, and that very powerful people would be implicated if the list were released.


@moonbus said
The refusal of the govt. at any level to release the suspect list is damning; it strongly suggests that a cover-up has been going on at very high levels for a very long time, and that very powerful people would be implicated if the list were released.
another strawman argument...you libs never deal in facts

obama and democrats had this info first...you think for one minute if Trump was implicated they wouldnt have went after him with it?

the inability to think logically and the willingness to be lead

1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople said
another strawman argument...you libs never deal in facts

obama and democrats had this info first...you think for one minute if Trump was implicated they wouldnt have went after him with it?

the inability to think logically and the willingness to be lead
If trump was implicated?

What 🤣????

He's been implicated a hundred times. Trump's own words were that Epstein stole his women.

You think for one minute that you can be neighbors and best friends with a guy for over 10 years and go on trips with him and host parties together and NOT know what he's up to?

2 edits

@Mott-The-Hoople said
another strawman argument...you libs never deal in facts

obama and democrats had this info first...you think for one minute if Trump was implicated they wouldnt have went after him with it?

the inability to think logically and the willingness to be lead
You are mistaken. Epstein's sex trafficking ring came to light in 2004, during the presidency of Bush the Lesser, and Epstein got off with a sweetheart deal, negotiated by a man who later became part of Trump45's inner circle.

Here is a link to the timeline:

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5478620/jeffrey-epstein-crimes-timeline-legal-case


@Mott-The-Hoople said
another strawman argument...you libs never deal in facts

obama and democrats had this info first...you think for one minute if Trump was implicated they wouldnt have went after him with it?

the inability to think logically and the willingness to be lead
Maybe not everyone thinks only about vindictive prosecution of the political rivals?

What about the other clients, trump excluded? Do you think they exist and should be held accountable for these heinous crimes?


@moonbus said
You are mistaken. Epstein's sex trafficking ring came to light in 2004, during the presidency of Bush the Lesser, and Epstein got off with a sweetheart deal, negotiated by a man who later became part of Trump45's inner circle.

Here is a link to the timeline:

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5478620/jeffrey-epstein-crimes-timeline-legal-case
Here's a fun exchange...

Epstein called Trump the "dog that hasn't barked" and says Trump spent "hours at my house" with one of the alleged sex trafficking victims.


https://www.npr.org/2025/11/12/nx-s1-5605582/epstein-files-release-trump-email-grijalva-massie


@wildgrass said


What about the other clients, trump excluded? Do you think they exist and should be held accountable for these heinous crimes?
prosecute all of the suspects for whom there is sufficient evidence to have a reasonable chance of getting a conviction, no matter how rich or powerful or influential. And yes, that includes Bill Clinton and the Andrew formerly known as Prince, if the evidence is solid.


It was nice to see Drudge Report featuring articles about certain Epstein emails even hours before Rep. Grijalva was finally sworn in today.

However, now I think Michael Wolff also has some explaining to do.


@wildgrass said
Here's a fun exchange...

Epstein called Trump the "dog that hasn't barked" and says Trump spent "hours at my house" with one of the alleged sex trafficking victims.


https://www.npr.org/2025/11/12/nx-s1-5605582/epstein-files-release-trump-email-grijalva-massie
Maybe we could say the dog who hasn't barked lives in a glass house with gilded ornaments from Home Depot.

On the topic of political leverage -- I assume that Trump has such leverage over all the cronies who lick his swollen ankles.

But I remember a saying: "If you step on people on the way up, they might kick you on your way down."

I'm looking forward to a joyous holiday season.


@Metal-Brain said
American support for UH is more than 60%. Do math much?
For it to happen, it has to be voted on in Congress. I don't care if Americans are 100% in favor of it. Republicans are NOT in favor of it. Republicans control all of Congress and the WH. It just ain't happening until the Dems get control.

I can't believe I actually have to explain this to you.


@Arkturos said
Maybe we could say the dog who hasn't barked lives in a glass house with gilded ornaments from Home Depot.

On the topic of political leverage -- I assume that Trump has such leverage over all the cronies who lick his swollen ankles.

But I remember a saying: "If you step on people on the way up, they might kick you on your way down."

I'm looking forward to a joyous holiday season.
"Be nice to everyone on your way up, because you're going to meet them all again on your way back down."

-- Mae West


@wildgrass said
Pam bondi in February: the Epstein client list is stilling on my desk right now.

Pam bondi now: there is no Epstein client list.

Where did it go? Why did it 'disapppear' right after Elon musk said Trump was in it? Why is ghislaune Maxwell rotting in prison for trafficking no one to nobody?
I don’t know where they went, but it certainly looks like they’re on their way back!


@shavixmir said
I don’t know where they went, but it certainly looks like they’re on their way back!
Apparently there are a few more witnesses to buy off, intimidate, or rub out, before the list can go public. Personally, I don't care about the list.


I wanna see the videos!



😲


@moonbus said
Apparently there are a few more witnesses to buy off, intimidate, or rub out, before the list can go public. Personally, I don't care about the list.


I wanna see the videos!



😲
I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to view child pornography.

And just imagine seeing trump’s sweaty arse grinding up and down on a 15 year old victim?

Jesus. I’d rather have my nuts cut off with a rusty spoon.


The "victim" the Dems are making a big deal over said many times that Trump just talked to her and never did anything inappropriate.