Where we gonna get cell phones now?

@wildgrass said
Invest in US, add jobs, expand domestic manufacturing. Same plan...

These are ongoing commitments. Obviously the 10 year plan to increase domestic manufacturing in the future won't have any effect on where your cell phone comes from during Trump's presidency.

Apple was already doing this. The crippling tariffs are pointless.

This one, who missed the train, says that the revising of imbalanced tariffs is pointless.

@KingDavid403 said
Let us take a pole, how many people here think that Trump does not know what he is doing.
Me you fool.
May 1st world wide protests against Humpty Trumpty and Musk-Rat. There's your poll numb-skull.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58bv2HYUq9A

I looked at the video, I think it said they were there to go get the Garcia criminal and bring him back? I think I will start a parade that says to stop men getting into women's sports. So? Start a parade of your own, man.
I don't get the parades, repubs and conservatives are too busy making great lives for themselves (with choices and planning, etc) to go on a street and tell people what they think about something...anything. I don't get that. I myself have never been iin a street except for a cross-walk.
Get a life man. I cant even imagine looking up and posting such a video. A video, about people who want Garcia back. I'm sure they exist. Why bother with a parade? I believe in tariffs. Sonhouse does not. Do we both have to have paades? For who? For you to look at? Yuk.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
try changing lipstick...might help

You think that there will be an all us made cell phone in 2025?

@AverageJoe1 said
This one, who missed the train, says that the revising of imbalanced tariffs is pointless.

The idea that tariffs should be balanced is idiotic.

@wildgrass said
The idea that tariffs should be balanced is idiotic.

You are wrong. Nirvana regarding trade and tariffs would be that there would be no tariffs. Totally free trade. Would that not be balanced?

I think that you and marauder are losing it. He took a SHouse-type jab, at Trump’s encouraging family values by looking into Trump‘s marital history. If I’m lying, I’m dying. Y’all really do need more material. New material. Leave all that crap to sun house.

@AverageJoe1 said
You are wrong. Nirvana regarding trade and tariffs would be that there would be no tariffs. Totally free trade. Would that not be balanced?

I think that you and marauder are losing it. He took a SHouse-type jab, at Trump’s encouraging family values by looking into Trump‘s marital history. If I’m lying, I’m dying. Y’all really do need more material. New material. Leave all that crap to sun house.

You would balance nothing?

@wildgrass said
You would balance nothing?

Call it balance, call it free trade. I think that if I studied it, as Sonhouse purports to do, that I would probably weigh on the side of no tariffs at all. I am a free trade supporter.
This is a debate, how would you handle it

@AverageJoe1 said
Call it balance, call it free trade. I think that if I studied it, as Sonhouse purports to do, that I would probably weigh on the side of no tariffs at all. I am a free trade supporter.
This is a debate, how would you handle it

Cool, it'd be good to get that going since our ports are empty. USA and China have no plans for discussing trade policy. Currently 145%