Originally posted by Metal Brain
Heck, how do we know any of them are? People often determine who to vote for on election day because of poll numbers. In theory, poll numbers can sway people to not vote for those with low poll numbers because of the perception that a certain candidate does not have a chance of winning.
Poll numbers can sway an election (in theory) so how do we know they are not fixed?
Respectfully, that is like asking did we really land on the moon in 1969. Maybe we didn't. Maybe it was a conspiracy to deceive the American people and the world, for whatever reason(s).
As for polls, the techniques and raw data are open for scrutiny. Further, the polls tend to be farily consistent across all organizations conducting the polls, left or right, rich or poor, establishment or anti-establishment, etc.
It just seems far-fetched to think that all of the polls are rigged.
Sure, what poll results and any associated conclusions that are presented are commonly affected by the ideology of the organization conducting and/or discussing the poll. Moreover, polls can be affected by phrasing of the poll questions, for example, but the statistical techniques have really become sophisticated and neutral for credibility reasons. And, again, the actual poll results and raw data collected are generally consistent accross the multitudes of organizations that conduct polls.
I would contend it a far-fetched conspiracy to think that all the polling organizations are in it together in concert to amazingly crank out the same false results time and time again without detection.
As an aside, cults tend to make far-fetched assertions, promote far-out conspiracies, and attack the "boogey man" in an effort to make their cult and beliefs/ideology more relevant. Or to explain why their cult is only accepted by a tiny minority, for instance.