The Justice Department warned former special counsel Robert Mueller on Monday not to stray beyond the four corners of his already-released report when he comes to Capitol Hill this week to testify.
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer, in a letter to Mr. Mueller, said that means any decisions Mr. Mueller made, or information he uncovered, that he didn’t include in his report will be out of bounds for the hearing.
The department also has a longstanding practice of not talking about people who were investigated but not charged, Mr. Weinsheimer said.
He urged Mr. Mueller to stick to his promise, made in late May, that if he were to be called to testify, he wouldn’t have anything to say beyond what was in his report, which has been released in somewhat redacted form.
@tobias9122 saidI thought this is called (or used to be called) obstruction of justice.
The Justice Department warned former special counsel Robert Mueller on Monday not to stray beyond the four corners of his already-released report when he comes to Capitol Hill this week to testify.
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer, in a letter to Mr. Mueller, said that means any decisions Mr. Mueller made, or information he uncovered, that he didn’t ...[text shortened]... ve anything to say beyond what was in his report, which has been released in somewhat redacted form.
@tobias9122 said“The department also has a longstanding practice of not talking about people who were investigated but not charged, Mr. Weinsheimer said. “
The Justice Department warned former special counsel Robert Mueller on Monday not to stray beyond the four corners of his already-released report when he comes to Capitol Hill this week to testify.
Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer, in a letter to Mr. Mueller, said that means any decisions Mr. Mueller made, or information he uncovered, that he didn’t ...[text shortened]... ve anything to say beyond what was in his report, which has been released in somewhat redacted form.
But I thought you couldn’t charge a sitting POTUS, so don’t say anything negative about the POTUS, nice dictatorship you trumpets have there.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/john-brennan-steele-dossier-trump-russia-investigation/
FMF may have had a valid point in telling me I had come to he wrong place for wise men,, this appears to be a ship load of fools. Toss in one woman that needs psychological help
@tobias9122 saidNational Review is yet another mouthpiece for the right.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/john-brennan-steele-dossier-trump-russia-investigation/
FMF may have had a valid point in telling me I had come to he wrong place for wise men,, this appears to be a ship load of fools. Toss in one woman that needs psychological help
@tobias9122 saidHave you read the Mueller Report?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/john-brennan-steele-dossier-trump-russia-investigation/
FMF may have had a valid point in telling me I had come to he wrong place for wise men,, this appears to be a ship load of fools. Toss in one woman that needs psychological help
In no way is it a "nothingburger".
And now, once we can get the man himself on the stand, the administration wants to silence him.
Surprise, surprise.
@suzianne saidThe man on the stand had 2 years to figure out what he wanted to say. He spoke. And the democrats are browbeating him into changing his story.
Have you read the Mueller Report?
In no way is it a "nothingburger".
And now, once we can get the man himself on the stand, the administration wants to silence him.
Surprise, surprise.
That's witness tampering and extortion. And it's not going to work. Wha Wha
@earl-of-trumps saidWe don't want him to "change his story".
The man on the stand had 2 years to figure out what he wanted to say. He spoke. And the democrats are browbeating him into changing his story.
That's witness tampering and extortion. And it's not going to work. Wha Wha
We want him to explain it to all the obviously stupid Republicans out there who think his report exonerated Trump.
Let him speak.
@suzianne saidMueller testifying is "obstruction of justice"!
I thought this is called (or used to be called) obstruction of justice.
@suzianne saidtalk about stupid,,,
We don't want him to "change his story".
We want him to explain it to all the obviously stupid Republicans out there who think his report exonerated Trump.
Let him speak.
Mueller findings...
ZERO collusion Trump/Russia
ZERO obstruction of justice.
If I am wrong on this please show where Trump is charged with either.
@suzianne saidMueller said no obstruction, are you the lawyer in charge? No just a talking head like the rest of us..
I thought this is called (or used to be called) obstruction of justice.
I want to see them delve into the FISA warrant myself.
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd you are correct, on both statements
@Suzianne
The DOJ set guidelines AT MUELLERS REQUEST>
Dumbass!
@mott-the-hoople saidHe wasn't, it's just hard for the liberals to absorb that fact.. still crying over the lost one that slipped away.
talk about stupid,,,
Mueller findings...
ZERO collusion Trump/Russia
ZERO obstruction of justice.
If I am wrong on this please show where Trump is charged with either.
Crooked Hillary was a poor choice.