Go back
Why was my READ THIS !!! thread deleted ?

Why was my READ THIS !!! thread deleted ?

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are radical Muslims just like there are radical people everywhere.

There is no axis of evil and there is no axis of goodness.

Domination and corruption lead to terrorism.

You will never stop all the terrorists with violence.

Violence will only lead to more violence.

Violence that leads to the deaths of innocent people will only lead to more terrorists.

Peace can only be obtained through education, negotiation, compromise and acceptance.

As the balance of power changes in the world, humility, moderation and diplomacy have to be part of the solution.

Supporting an organization of united nations has to be part of the solution.

Disempowering that organization is a path toward annihilation.

Bolstering that organization will help bring peace, as will your own efforts to ensure that those in power meet the above requirements.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
There are radical Muslims just like there are radical people everywhere.

There is no axis of evil and there is no axis of goodness.

Domination and corruption lead to terrorism.

You will never stop all the terrorists with violence.

Violence will only lead to more violence.

Violence that leads to the deaths of innocent people will only lead t ...[text shortened]... bring peace, as will your own efforts to ensure that those in power meet the above requirements.
I didn't read your thread that you say was deleted. While I happen to agree with you on some of the things you say, you are a terrible debater. You repeat the same platitudes over and over and over, and you have not said one thing in the past week that you haven't already said. People would be less resentful of you and your views if you would lay off of creating so many threads that are all exactly the same, save for the title. And do a little research; bring us some facts and back up your statements.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natural Science
I didn't read your thread that you say was deleted. While I happen to agree with you on some of the things you say, you are a terrible debater. You repeat the same platitudes over and over and over, and you have not said one thing in the past week that you haven't already said. People would be less resentful of you and your views if you would la ...[text shortened]... save for the title. And do a little research; bring us some facts and back up your statements.
Where are the platitudes in the opening post ?

Surely you can't dismiss them that easily ?

(By the way, my rec count has rocketed in the last couple of weeks)

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG

(By the way, my rec count has rocketed in the last couple of weeks)
(the ability to register on a chess site is not proof of higher intelligence.

review your own posts if you want proof of that statement.)

just imagine what your count would be if the site allowed anti-recs!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
(the ability to register on a chess site is not proof of higher intelligence.

review your own posts if you want proof of that statement.)

just imagine what your count would be if the site allowed anti-recs!
Sure, I guess the average American would disagree with the opening post.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
Where are the platitudes in the opening post ?

Surely you can't dismiss them that easily ?

(By the way, my rec count has rocketed in the last couple of weeks)
Well, since the definition of "platitude" is "a banal, trite, or stale remark", I guess the more appropriate question would be, which of them wasn't?

By the way, the point wasn't to dismiss them, as I've already said I happen to agree with a few. But you just keep posting the same things over and over without elaborating. It's what's called "building an argument", and you are horrible at it.

Of course your rec's have skyrocketed. Every time you create a new thread saying the same thing as all your previous threads, you give the same simps who have been rec'ing all your posts a chance to rec some more without you even having bothered to come up with something new to say.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

here's a good use for stale bread.

http://www.dianaskitchen.com/page/recipes03/0826_breadpudding.htm

"French Apple Bread Pudding

From an Eagle Brand recipe brochure, this is an easy bread pudding dessert made with applesauce and raisins.
3 eggs
1 (14 ounce) can Eagle Brand Sweetened Condensed Milk
1 jar (23 ounces) chunky applesauce, or use 2 1/2 to 3 cups chopped apples
1 3/4 cups hot water
1/4 cup melted butter
1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
1 teaspoon vanilla
4 cups French bread cubes
1/2 cup raisins

Preheat oven to 350°. In a large bowl, beat eggs, add sweetened condensed milk, applesauce or apples, water, melted butter, cinnamon, and vanilla. Stir in bread and raisins, moistening completely. Turn into a buttered 9-inch square baking dish. Bake 1 hour or until a knife inserted in center comes out clean.
Cool. Serve warm with ice cream or whipped topping or dessert sauce. Cover and refrigerate leftovers. "

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

(hmm. better make that Freedom Apple Bread Pudding.)

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yum !

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

the key word is "mainly". do you have a count?

here is the head of the "no WMDs?" thread, repeated for your pleasure:

"the next time someone tells you the Coalition was not justified in invading Iraq, point them to this link, a 108-page rebuttal:

Iraq: Setting the Record Straight
April 2005
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraq-042005.pdf
"

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Natural Science
Of course your rec's have skyrocketed. Every time you create a new thread saying the same thing as all your previous threads, you give the same simps who have been rec'ing all your posts a chance to rec some more without you even having bothered to come up with something new to say.
Is it about saying something new ?

Maybe if the critics had been more persistent about Vietnam then Iraq wouldn't have happened.

By the way, I repeated myself mainly in threads that others opened specifically about me.

Can I suggest you copy my opening post and insert a rating beneath each line saying whether you're inclined to Strongly disagree, Disagree, Agree or Strongly agree ?

I'll debate if I don't have to scroll through attacks from people suffering blind patriotism, etc

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
here's a good use for stale bread.

http://www.dianaskitchen.com/page/recipes03/0826_breadpudding.htm

"French Apple Bread Pudding

From an Eagle Brand recipe brochure, this is an easy bread pudding dessert made with applesauce and raisins.
3 eggs
1 (14 ounce) can Eagle Brand Sweetened Condensed Milk
1 jar (23 ounces) chunky applesauce, or us ...[text shortened]... rve warm with ice cream or whipped topping or dessert sauce. Cover and refrigerate leftovers. "
Sounds tasty.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
the key word is "mainly". do you have a count?

here is the head of the "no WMDs?" thread, repeated for your pleasure:

"the next time someone tells you the Coalition was not justified in invading Iraq, point them to this link, a 108-page rebuttal:

Iraq: Setting the Record Straight
April 2005
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraq-042005.pdf
"
You've cited that link using the same words about 50 times. Aren't you guilty of "spamming" just as much as STANG??

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
You've cited that link using the same words about 50 times. Aren't you guilty of "spamming" just as much as STANG??
SPAMMING LEADS TO MORE SPAMMING

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
You've cited that link using the same words about 50 times. Aren't you guilty of "spamming" just as much as STANG??
I feel that I've been banned for my political message as much as for spamming.

Other people get away with it.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.