13 Oct 08
Is "...queering Elementary Education an important contribution to nourishing the ethical heart of teaching," as Obama pal and unrepentant former '60s bomb-throwing terrorist William Ayers puts it, or is it just another way for degenerates to get at our children and destroy America from within?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77640
13 Oct 08
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterSo all of a sudden, if you visit someone's house, you share their ideology?
Is "...queering Elementary Education an important contribution to nourishing the ethical heart of teaching," as Obama pal and unrepentant former '60s bomb-throwing terrorist William Ayers puts it, or is it just another way for degenerates to get at our children and destroy America from within?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77640
desparation from the neo-cons grows.
14 Oct 08
1 edit
No amount of evidence is ever going to convince the Obama supporters here that there is any link between Obama and Ayers.
If it is true, who cares? There are more important things going on here, we've got to prevent a Republican from taking office, even if it is the liberal McCain.
14 Oct 08
Originally posted by EladarThis FactCheck article is, as usual, illuminating: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/he_lied_about_bill_ayers.html
No amount of evidence is ever going to convince the Obama supporters here that there is any link between Obama and Ayers.
If it is true, who cares? There are more important things going on here, we've got to prevent a Republican from taking office, even if it is the liberal McCain.
14 Oct 08
1 edit
Originally posted by EladarWhy not quote the entire paragraph rather than using the usual misinformation tactics of the right wing? To wit:
I found it very illuminating:
[b]Even the description of Ayers as a "terrorist" is a matter of interpretation. [/b]
Even the description of Ayers as a "terrorist" is a matter of interpretation. Setting off bombs can fairly be described as terrorism even when they are intended to cause only property damage, which is what Ayers has admitted doing in his youth. But for nearly three decades since, Ayers has lived the relatively quiet life of an educator. It would be correct to call him a "former terrorist," and an "unapologetic" one at that. But if McCain means the word "terrorist" to invoke images of 9/11, he's being misleading; Ayers is no Osama bin Laden now, and never was.
Seems accurate, something McCain's ads are not.
14 Oct 08
Originally posted by EladarCompared to terrorist a la Al Qaida, yes, it IS a matter of interpretation. The Weathermen were very explicit in their desire to avoid physical harm to anyone. There intention was to cause material damage to raise awareness of their cause. I do not condone what they did in anyway. But the word terrorist now is generally equated with killing mass populations of innocents. This is not at all what the Weathermen did.
I found it very illuminating:
[b]Even the description of Ayers as a "terrorist" is a matter of interpretation. [/b]