Go back
Wmds

Wmds

Debates

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Should chemical weapons really be considered equivalent to nukes and plagues? To me, they're just not quite in the same league as the other two.

J

Joined
21 Nov 07
Moves
4689
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Should chemical weapons really be considered equivalent to nukes and plagues? To me, they're just not quite in the same league as the other two.
They all take lives on a massive scale, don't they? 😕

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jigtie
They all take lives on a [b]massive scale, don't they? 😕[/b]
Depends what a "massive" scale is. Firebombs I would argue take lives on a more massive scale than poison gas bombs do.

I doubt a chemical weapon exists that can do the damage that a nuke, AIDS or the Spanish Flu can do.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Should chemical weapons really be considered equivalent to nukes and plagues? To me, they're just not quite in the same league as the other two.
I say biological weapons are some of the scariest

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Firebombs I would argue take lives on a more massive scale than poison gas bombs do.
Well then, why don't you call poison gas bombs WMD and firebombs WMMD?

HG

Joined
22 Jun 08
Moves
8801
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Well then, why don't you call poison gas bombs WMD and firebombs WMMD?
We have to first define massive. 100+ people,, 0r?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Should chemical weapons really be considered equivalent to nukes and plagues? To me, they're just not quite in the same league as the other two.
Perhaps a better way to approach this is asking what manner of death is better? Is it via nukes? Is it via chemical weapons? What floats your boat?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
We have to first define massive. 100+ people,, 0r?
Looking at the back of my fag packet, I'd say more than can be killed in a regular sort of way by an artillery shell. There. plucked from the sky. A definition.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Perhaps a better way to approach this is asking what manner of death is better? Is it via nukes? Is it via chemical weapons? What floats your boat?
No, that would be "weapons of cruel and unusual destruction".

HG

Joined
22 Jun 08
Moves
8801
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Looking at the back of my fag packet, I'd say more than can be killed in a regular sort of way by an artillery shell. There. plucked from the sky. A definition.
I think still to this day, the most people killed here in the States by a single civilian is 79. he chained the doors to a disco shut, threw gasoline in, and burned the whole club down...so in some way or form,, any weapon can work.
A chain or cable strung head high across a freeway?
In a regular kind of way sounds odd does it not?
Napalm was and still is horrible. A bit of tide laundry detergent mixed with gasoline.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
I think still to this day, the most people killed here in the States by a single civilian is 79. he chained the doors to a disco shut, threw gasoline in, and burned the whole club down...so in some way or form,, any weapon can work.
A chain or cable strung head high across a freeway?
In a regular kind of way sounds odd does it not?
Napalm was and still is horrible. A bit of tide laundry detergent mixed with gasoline.
"Horrible" and "Mass Destruction" are two different things. Death by fire is pretty horrible.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
In a regular kind of way sounds odd does it not?
If an artillery shell took out a medicine factory and then 10,000 died for want of medicine, I wouldn't call that shell a weapon of mass destruction.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Looking at the back of my fag packet, I'd say more than can be killed in a regular sort of way by an artillery shell. There. plucked from the sky. A definition.
did you skip over this to read it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_packaging_warning_messages#Indonesia

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
05 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
did you skip over this to read it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_packaging_warning_messages#Indonesia
talk about WMDs!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_smoking#Health

The World Health Organization estimate that tobacco caused 5.4 million deaths in 2004[75] and 100 million deaths over the course of the 20th century.[76]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Adverse_effects_of_tobacco_smoking.svg

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.