Originally posted by Sambo69I agree. By definition Bush is a terrorist. Only, perhaps his stupidity makes up for it somehow. It must be troublesome being that dumb. I think the real terrorists are the people who voted for him a second time. Then again, perhaps they're as intellectually impaired as Bush himself. Who knows? 😞
http://tvnewslies.org/html/george_w__bush_-_world_s_leadi.html
Originally posted by stockenTo some extent, they share his corruption.
I agree. By definition Bush is a terrorist. Only, perhaps his stupidity makes up for it somehow. It must be troublesome being that dumb. I think the real terrorists are the people who voted for him a second time. Then again, perhaps they're as intellectually impaired as Bush himself. Who knows? 😞
See the thread "Paying politicians for peace".
2 edits
Originally posted by stockenType FAILURE in Google search,
I agree. By definition Bush is a terrorist. Only, perhaps his stupidity makes up for it somehow. It must be troublesome being that dumb. I think the real terrorists are the people who voted for him a second time. Then again, perhaps they're as intellectually impaired as Bush himself. Who knows? 😞
Click " I'm feeling lucky"
Enjoy...he..he...he...
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseLet's see now, as I understand it then we can divide the American voting public into two groups: 1. the idiots who voted for the Republican winner. 2. the idiots who voted for the Democratic loser.
He's not the sharpest knive in the pantry, thats for sure. I guess he matches the intelligence of the idiots who elected him, they just wanted one of their own in the white house, eh.
Ooops, there's still a third group: the non-idiots who voted Libertarian.
Originally posted by stockenHow is Bush a terrorist? Only a Swede would come up with that asinine statement.
I agree. By definition Bush is a terrorist. Only, perhaps his stupidity makes up for it somehow. It must be troublesome being that dumb. I think the real terrorists are the people who voted for him a second time. Then again, perhaps they're as intellectually impaired as Bush himself. Who knows? 😞
Originally posted by slimjimA terrorist causes terror correct? If Bush was causing terror say in Iraq and previously in Afghanistan then he would be a terrorist by that definition correct?
How is Bush a terrorist? Only a Swede would come up with that asinine statement.
Or you could go according to the US State Department definition:
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
(taken from the site STANG/Sambo linked to)
Originally posted by XanthosNZI guess Bush is causing terror among the Taliban and Afghanistan and the baath party in Iraq. Apparantly he also terrifies you also. Don't worry NZ isn't in our sights so you can come out form under the bed now.🙄🙄
A terrorist causes terror correct? If Bush was causing terror say in Iraq and previously in Afghanistan then he would be a terrorist by that definition correct?
Or you could go according to the US State Department definition:
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilia ...[text shortened]... , in furtherance of political or social objectives.
(taken from the site STANG/Sambo linked to)
Originally posted by slimjimSometimes people have this thing called compassion. It means they aren't just looking out for their own interests.
I guess Bush is causing terror among the Taliban and Afghanistan and the baath party in Iraq. Apparantly he also terrifies you also. Don't worry NZ isn't in our sights so you can come out form under the bed now.🙄🙄