Go back
Worth remembering about “Scientific experts”

Worth remembering about “Scientific experts”

Debates

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
21 Jun 21
2 edits

From the Holy Guardian article (11 years ago)

”Scientists who drew up the key World Health Organisation guidelines advising governments to stockpile drugs in the event of a flu pandemic had previously been paid by drug companies which stood to profit, according to a report out today

An investigation by the British Medical Journal and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the not-for-profit reporting unit, shows that WHO guidance issued in 2004 was authored by three scientists who had previously received payment for other work from Roche, which makes Tamiflu, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), manufacturer of Relenza.

City analysts say that pharmaceutical companies banked more than $7bn (£4.8bn) as governments stockpiled drugs. The issue of transparency has risen to the forefront of public health debate after dramatic predictions last year about a swine flu pandemic did not come true.“


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jun/04/swine-flu-experts-big-pharmaceutical

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
21 Jun 21

@divegeester said
From the article (11 years ago)

”Scientists who drew up the key World Health Organisation guidelines advising governments to stockpile drugs in the event of a flu pandemic had previously been paid by drug companies which stood to profit, according to a report out today

An investigation by the British Medical Journal and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the ...[text shortened]... true.“


https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jun/04/swine-flu-experts-big-pharmaceutical
Yeah, stockpiling drugs against a pandemic sure looks stupid after 2020.

Good point.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
21 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
Yeah, stockpiling drugs against a pandemic sure looks stupid after 2020.

Good point.
As a lawyer, do you get away with deliberately missing the point when in court?

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
21 Jun 21

Follow the money.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
22 Jun 21

@divegeester said
As a lawyer, do you get away with deliberately missing the point when in court?
What is the point though, do you think it suspicious that scientists advising WHO on epidemiology and how to prepare for it have also worked in the pharmaceutical industry?
Because it’s a bit like being suspicious of the Bank of England for hiring economic advisors who have worked in the banking sector.

k

Joined
15 Dec 03
Moves
313682
Clock
22 Jun 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.