Originally posted by scottishinnzSo why do you persist in making wild allegations about being 'stalked' (as if anyone would think you worth staliking anyway) instead of addressing yourself to the question I put to you originally.
And you remain saying nothing of value. You know, this is a debates forum, I think you might be lost.
That was "What is the relevance of your presence in Lockerbie at the time of the bombimg atrociry there in relation to the attempted atrocities in the Haymarket and Glasgow"?
You entered the debate on the latter events by claiming special status on account of your proximity to the former, but the two are completely unrelated, apart from muslim involvement.
There can be no debating with a clown who cannot see an obvious logical fallacy in his argument. It is called 'ignoratio elenchi'.
Edit: jammer also pointed out to you the error in your argument by his 'a fortiori' postion in relation to the muslim attacks in the USA, but you still failed to see the point.
Originally posted by AlcibiadesOh, and I thought this thread was about gay marriage.
So why do you persist in making wild allegations about being 'stalked' (as if anyone would think you worth staliking anyway) instead of addressing yourself to the question I put to you originally.
That was "What is the relevance of your presence in Lockerbie at the time of the bombimg atrociry there in relation to the attempted atrocities in the Haymarket and Glasgow"?
Originally posted by AlcibiadesBring it up in the relevant thread, and I'll try and explain it in smaller words for you.
So why do you persist in making wild allegations about being 'stalked' (as if anyone would think you worth staliking anyway) instead of addressing yourself to the question I put to you originally.
That was "What is the relevance of your presence in Lockerbie at the time of the bombimg atrociry there in relation to the attempted atrocities in the Haymar ...[text shortened]... ion in relation to the muslim attacks in the USA, but you still failed to see the point.
Originally posted by scottishinnzI have referred to it several times previously but you have failed to answer so I am not going to do so again. In fact, I do not intend to waste any more time on you and shall consign you to oblivion along with catfoodmit, who defends racism in Ireland.
Bring it up in the relevant thread, and I'll try and explain it in smaller words for you.
Originally posted by pawnhandleryour meant to judge a thread by its title if it says how to survive armageddon but instead your reading about spongebob squarepants your sort of lost aye?
Ahh, you're judging a thread by its title again!
And my brother joined for me i dont know wethere there was an age limit back then
Originally posted by Alcibiadesis that your only comeback, you still are to say anything of value and then the only thing you have to say to my points which are actually valid is "You poor little chap." I daresay your a bit lost, this is the debates forum so get some arguements.
You poor little chap.
I kinda feel sorry for you relying in the bible to save you, you should make the most of this life because there aint one after it