17% Solution
Yes, it's a well known and established fact of medical science research that human beings collectively utilize a mere 1/6th or approximately
17% of the capacity of the conscious mind in making daily decisions. Wonder why... Then, again, sometimes answers raise more questions
than the original question posed. Factor in the commonly chosen path of least resistance (falling on your shield rather than on your sword)
along with the fact that without the heads down, pedestrian drones the hive would die... and, at least, political shenanigans become clear.
😉
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby"it's a well known and established fact of medical science"
17% Solution
Yes, it's a well known and established fact of medical science research that human beings collectively utilize a mere 1/6th or approximately
17% of the capacity of the conscious mind in making daily decisions. Wonder why... Then, again, sometimes answers raise more questions
than the original question posed. Factor in the com ...[text shortened]... rian drones the hive would die... and, at least, political shenanigans become clear.
😉
bollocks its a myth!
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html
http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=people-only-use-10-percent-of-brain
etcetera
Originally posted by wolfgang59absolutely.
"it's a well known and established fact of medical science"
bollocks its a myth!
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html
http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=people-only-use-10-percent-of-brain
etcetera
I'm surprised Grampy hasn't abolished this myth from his mind. Maybe he's only using 17% of it....?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbySo now that you've been called out on using false information you resort to petty jokes and petty insults?
Wondering if the contrarian viewpoint you've expressed suggests: (1) That the state of affairs in Washington is unlikely to change; (2) That
the internecine forum fifedom pi$$ing contests are a fact of sandbox life; (3) That it's highly improbable our chess ratings will ever improve.
😀
😞
Originally posted by wolfgang59You are wrong, and so is Bobby. People use less that 1% of their brains.
"it's a well known and established fact of medical science"
bollocks its a myth!
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html
http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=people-only-use-10-percent-of-brain
etcetera
Here is proof:
http://tinyurl.com/3ed35j
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyBut it isn't.
Thought it interesting and accepted it as accurate.
One time a guy was giving some pamphlets on the street that had written on them that Einstein said that we only used 10% of our brains and some guy would teach us how to use the other 90%. I told him Einstein never told such a thing. That even if he told such a thing it would be wrong. And that Einstein was a physicist, not a neuro-something so he really had no say in what amount of our brain we use or not. The poor guy that was handing the pamphlets went ballistic and didn't want to give us the pamphlets anymore.
Originally posted by adam warlockEinstein was no Einstein. 😕
But it isn't.
One time a guy was giving some pamphlets on the street that had written on them that Einstein said that we only used 10% of our brains and some guy would teach us how to use the other 90%. I told him Einstein never told such a thing. That even if he told such a thing it would be wrong. And that Einstein was a physicist, not a neuro-som ...[text shortened]... was handing the pamphlets guy went ballistic and didn't want to give us the pamphlets anymore.
Originally posted by adam warlockAny idea what percent range we do typically utilize in routine daily decision making?
But it isn't.
One time a guy was giving some pamphlets on the street that had written on them that Einstein said that we only used 10% of our brains and some guy would teach us how to use the other 90%. I told him Einstein never told such a thing. That even if he told such a thing it would be wrong. And that Einstein was a physicist, not a neuro-som ...[text shortened]... was handing the pamphlets guy went ballistic and didn't want to give us the pamphlets anymore.