Originally posted by PalynkaThis is a point you get to often in these forums: your "holding yer breath till you turn blue" stage. I gave a detailed post responding to you, if you have nothing of consequence to add (not that anything you've said so far was of consequence), so be it.
I humoured you once by repeating what I wrote earlier, I'm not going to humour you twice.
And you seem obsessed by Ivanhoe. I suggest therapy.
I find your debating style similar to Ivanhoe's. That shows no "obsession"; only bemusement.
Originally posted by no1marauderAmusing.
This is a point you get to often in these forums: your "holding yer breath till you turn blue" stage. I gave a detailed post responding to you, if you have nothing of consequence to add (not that anything you've said so far was of consequence), so be it.
I find your debating style similar to Ivanhoe's. That shows no "obsession"; only bemusement.
You asked me to repeat arguments I've provided before. Twice. I'm done amusing you. It's not me turning blue in the face, it's you repeatedly pretending you didn't see my arguments. Sadly for you, I don't run around in circles like a headless chicken.