264d
@Drewnogal saidI think there is every reason for both to make sure there will not be unwanted children - or venereal diseases.
So what happens if a man has sex with a woman, on the basis that she tells him she’s on the pill, but she isn’t?
Leading to her getting pregnant then later seeking financial support for the child?
@Drewnogal saidI doubt she'd be given 4 years in jail.
So what happens if a man has sex with a woman, on the basis that she tells him she’s on the pill, but she isn’t?
Leading to her getting pregnant then later seeking financial support for the child?
264d
@A-Unique-Nickname saidThat's true, so we have to be careful. I can't comment on the white/black issue.
I would suggest that the woman was white and the guy was given 4 years for being black. Anyway condoms aren't perfect, they can break, slip off etc...
@A-Unique-Nickname saidInteresting case of a man, a budding physician, who tried to sue an ex partner (of 2 months) for 4 million dollars because of the emotional trauma of having fatherhood unwittingly forced upon him. He claimed her deception over her use of the pill had deprived him of the benefit of choosing when and with whom he would become a dad.
I doubt she'd be given 4 years in jail.
He didn’t get a cent!
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/man-has-no-grounds-to-sue-woman-for-4m-after-she-lied-about-birth-control-and-had-child-judge
263d
@Drewnogal saidIt shouldn't be in the news in the first place.
Interesting case of a man, a budding physician, who tried to sue an ex partner (of 2 months) for 4 million dollars because of the emotional trauma of having fatherhood unwittingly forced upon him. He claimed her deception over her use of the pill had deprived him of the benefit of choosing when and with whom he would become a dad.
He didn’t get a cent!
https://nation ...[text shortened]... canada/man-has-no-grounds-to-sue-woman-for-4m-after-she-lied-about-birth-control-and-had-child-judge
263d
@Drewnogal saidMaybe because its a personal matter and not news worthy, the guy probably wanted to name shame and get some publicity.
Because a child was involved? The names weren’t divulged.
263d
@A-Unique-Nickname saidAs you say, it is a personal matter.
Maybe because its a personal matter and not news worthy, the guy probably wanted to name shame and get some publicity.