A new "In Crowd"

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Being I nominated you and you declined because you were chairperson, would I be able to nominate someone else now, If I can think of someone worthy to be in the "INNER CIRCLE" with the "IN CROWD"? Would want to be a part of this? I am asking for people who may want to be nominated. We only have until the 31rst people!!!

Some are born for the in crowd, some achieve their place in it, and some have in crowdness thrust upon them.

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
To be perfectly honest, and I am perfectly honest, I have no explanation.

If you were in a dishonest mood, what would the explanation be?

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
To be perfectly honest, and I am perfectly honest, I have no explanation.

Okay. But at least learn how to spell it.

Originally posted by FMF
Some are born for the in crowd, some achieve their place in it, and some have in crowdness thrust upon them.

Yep. That's me alright.

Originally posted by FMF
Some are born for the in crowd, some achieve their place in it, and some have in crowdness thrust upon them.

Sir,
Some are just wolves in sheeps clothing. 😉

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by FMF
If you were in a dishonest mood, what would the explanation be?

Sir,
I have never known GBS to be dishonest.

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by josephw
Yep. That's me alright.

Joseph,
Did you really want a nomination? Andy said I could have another vote as he declined because he is chairperson. His Thread his rules!! 😉

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I have never known GBS to be dishonest.

On this occasion I am inviting him to spice up his life a bit.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Joseph,
Did you really want a nomination? Andy said I could have another vote as he declined because he is chairperson. His Thread his rules!! 😉

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Is this "in crowd" thing really that serious? I wouldn't want to be part of something snobbish.

Originally posted by josephw
Is this "in crowd" thing really that serious? I wouldn't want to be part of something snobbish.

Joseph,
This is a matter that is better discussed by P.M., it goes back years ago. Should be a dead issue by now, but gets brought up from time to time.

Kind Regards
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by FMF
On this occasion I am inviting him to spice up his life a bit.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I have never known GBS to be dishonest.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By being dishonest?

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by josephw
Is this "in crowd" thing really that serious? I wouldn't want to be part of something snobbish.

Suzianne goes on and on and on about a supposed "in crowd". She's even referred to it as a "cabal" trying to "control" the forum. She's the only one, as far as I can see, who is "serious" about it. You should raise it with her. HandyAndy's thread is simply having a bit of fun with it. Did you really not realize this until 15 pages into this thread? 😛

Originally posted by Very Rusty
By being dishonest?

It's a bit of levity, Very Rusty.

Originally posted by FMF
[b]Suzianne goes on and on and on about a supposed "in crowd". She's even referred to it as a "cabal" trying to "control" the forum. She's the only one, as far as I can see, who is "serious" about it. /b]

Sir,
You've been around here 1 year longer than me. You know what she is talking about as well as I do. Why do you pretend not to know anything? Were you not in the forums between 2006 - 2008 I believe it was, if memory serves me correctly. It all began then. Actually I use to call them the "INNER CIRCLE", maybe you just have selective memory.

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR

Originally posted by FMF
It's a bit of levity, Very Rusty.

Sir,
No, Actually it is called lying!

Kind Regards,
Sincerely,
-VR