Go back
affect and effect

affect and effect

General


1 edit

-Removed-
tee hee, lighten up dude, you're a miserable old poker faced killjoy 😀



Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
He apologized,why not just let it go?

What's the point exactly in dredging it up in yet another thread? (Like you've done here with the earlier post. - 'With me in the past...' ). Clearly those things are not true about you. Why would you want them resurrected?
Because, having apologized, robbie then got annoyed about something about a week later and brought it up again, and he has done so repeatedly ever since. If he'd apologized and he'd meant it, that would have been the end of it. But he can't help himself. It's one of his favourite bits of 'banter" and, as you know, he likes to repeat his "jokes" over and over and over again.


Originally posted by Suzianne
Hypocritical in the extreme.

No one here whines more about "people not liking" him, than you.

This thread is a perfect example of this. Five pages of childish whining so far.
Make that 13.


The more I read of divegeester, the more I hear FMF. Either they're one and the same, or they're PMing each other so much that divegeester is morphing.


-Removed-
Actually, out of the two of us, it appears I was the only one who 'read around the thread before moralising.'

In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!

1 edit

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!
It's a reminder of robbie's modus operandi. On this thread robbie was trying to characterize divegeester's criticism of him as being linked in some way to divegeester's supposed homosexuality, something robbie has flung out there umpteen times before, and which he has flung at me umpteen times before, just as he has tried to characterize - in my case - disagreement with him as being perhaps caused by me being sexually abused as a child, and just as he has used insinuations about me being a pedophile to distract from disagreements he was having with me in which he was not faring well. Slurs about sexual orientation, about being sexually abused, about being a pedophile. This is all part of robbie's modus operandi. I was reminding him of that as he trotted out stuff about homoeroticism for the umpteenth time. 😉


Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it.
On this thread, robbie said this: "You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children". I did not raise the fact that this internet site allows children - robbie did. I did not raise the issue of the way I conduct myself - robbie did. I did not suggest that the way I conduct myself is in any way a threat to children - robbie did. I did not suggest that I should "be more careful" - robbie did. 🙂

1 edit

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Actually, out of the two of us, it appears I was the only one who 'read around the thread before moralising.'

In this thread (which I made clear I was speaking about) it was FMF who raised it. - I note, in subsequent posts, you say he was just reminding Robbie. Why exactly? What purpose does such a reminder serve?!
Its most interesting. What FMF does with varying degrees of success is attempt to dredge elements up from the past and to use them as a catalyst to discredit, vilify, gain moral leverage over other users. The term is retrospective trolling. In this instance he was playing for high stakes because accusations of paedophilia are quite serious. However I simply called his bluff and he had nothing but a pair of duces and a joker named divegeester as effectual as a man down. Why was he lost? because he repeatedly brings matters up as is his MO when others are perfectly willing to let it go and may even have apologised! FMF cannot let it go as you have witnessed and harbours it like a grudge for the rest of his days making him miserable and a killjoy.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
What FMF does with varying degrees of success is attempt to dredge elements up from the past and to use them as a catalyst to discredit, vilify, gain moral leverage over other users.
Do you feel there are things "from the past" that you said that "discredit" you?

3 edits

Originally posted by FMF
Do you feel there are things "from the past" that you said that "discredit" you?
I feel that you are miserable and a killjoy because you won't let go and it builds up resentment in you. As for me, I am fully cognizant of the fact that as a human being I am prone to aberration and will inevitably make mistakes and thus I don't beat myself up over them and simply try to learn from the experience. This is the reason that I am joyful and skip about gleefully whereas you appear to me to be stomping about full of resentment and quite miserable.

4 edits


3 edits

Originally posted by FMF
On this thread, robbie said this: [b]"You should be more careful in the way you conduct yourself on internet sites that allow children". I did not raise the fact that this internet site allows children - robbie did. I did not raise the issue of the way I conduct myself - robbie did. I did not suggest that the way I conduct myself is in any way a threat to children - robbie did. I did not suggest that I should "be more careful" - robbie did. 🙂[/b]