affect and effect

-Removed-

I vaguely recall a thread that seemed to go on forever where you denied it too. I don't think I believed you though.

Originally posted by Suzianne
And btw, do us all a favor, and stop with the stupid little "smiley" when you're trying to take someone apart. It's just a pathetic attempt to appear like you're not desperate to connect with what is usually just a "swish".

Would you describe yourself as being opposed to people on these forums "trying to take someone apart", and, if so, will one find the principle behind this opposition clearly demonstrated by your own forum conduct if one were to look at your posting history? 😛

Originally posted by FMF
Would you describe yourself as being opposed to people on these forums "trying to take someone apart", and, if so, will one find the principle behind this opposition clearly demonstrated by your own forum conduct if one were to look at your posting history? 😛

Maybe. I don't know. Can you repeat the question? 😵

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Maybe. I don't know. Can you repeat the question? 😵

The question was addressed to Suzianne.

Originally posted by FMF
The question was addressed to Suzianne.

what!? 😵

-Removed-

Why don't you just come out loud and proud Jeetser, your constant homoerotic fantasising about people with their 'pants down' and crude references to the male anatomy is rather telling. Free your mind Jeester!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why don't you just come out loud and proud Jeetser, your constant homoerotic fantasising about people with their 'pants down' and crude references to the male anatomy is rather telling. Free your mind Jeester!

As all British people ought to know, a "bell end" is an idiom for a 'person who is stupid, and contemptible', while having your "pants down" is an idiom which means to make a complete fool of yourself in public. It is you who has chosen - disingenuously - to frame these expressions as "homoerotic", which is, of course, you trying to deflect in a way that only a complete bell end with his pants down at his ankles would attempt to do, idiomatically speaking. 😛

Originally posted by FMF
As all British people ought to know, a "bell end" is an idiom for a 'person who is stupid, and contemptible', while having your "pants down" is an idiom which means to make a complete fool of yourself in public. It is you who has chosen - disingenuously - to frame these expressions as "homoerotic", which is, of course, you trying to deflect in a way that only a ...[text shortened]... plete bell end with his pants down at his ankles would attempt to do, idiomatically speaking. 😛

say what?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
say what?

I think the exchange would have been somewhat funnier if you'd just left the back and forth as it was. "Say what?" is just a kind of nothing-to-say Suziannism and sorely lacking in the banter department. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
I think the exchange would have been somewhat funnier if you'd just left the back and forth as it was. "Say what?" is just a kind of nothing-to-say Suziannism and sorely lacking in the banter department. 😉

Thanks, if I need any more unsolicited advice on banter you da goto man! Jeester the sophistication guru and now you, Banterman!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Thanks, if I need any more unsolicited advice on banter you da goto man! Jeester the sophistication guru and now you, Banterman!

All I'm saying is that "Say what?" is merely a got-nothing-in-reply Suziannism and, what with you trying so hard to be very funny with the "homoerotic" thing, I thought someone ought to tell you. 😉

-Removed-

I'm taking lessons from Banterman above and a rather sophisticated chap by the name of Juiced jeester! Can i get back to you on that? I need to check in with them first!