Go back
affect and effect

affect and effect

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Do you agree or disagree that a child abuser is more or less likely to come forward if they know that they will be reported due to mandatory reporting.
I believe that a child abuser is more likely to abuse children - and to abuse children again and again - and to resume his abuse of children - if he knows that the corporation he's a member of is going to keep it secret. I think he's less likely to come forward and will just chance his arm, safe in the knowledge that the organization will keep it all confidential if he gets caught.



Originally posted by robbie carrobie
a) good idea
b) not a good idea
What "good idea" robbie? What are you talking about?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I believe that a child abuser is more likely to abuse children - and to abuse children again and again - and to resume his abuse of children - if he knows that the corporation he's a member of is going to keep it secret. I think he's less likely to come forward and will just chance his arm, safe in the knowledge that the organization will keep it all confidential if he gets caught.
Ok i will try again, do you agree or disagree that a child abuser is more or less likely to come forward if they know they will be reported to the authorities.

a)more likely
b) less likely

lets see if we can get an honest answer out of you for once FMF because quite frankly you are not doing very well so far.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Oh dear, the voice of reason.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Ok i will try again, do you agree or disagree that a child abuser is more or less likely to come forward if they know they will be reported to the authorities.

a)more likely
b) less likely

lets see if we can get an honest answer out of you for once FMF because quite frankly you are not doing very well so far.
I already answered it honestly and point blank in the uneditted post you were responding to.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
What "good idea" robbie? What are you talking about?
I don't think that obfuscation is helping you much FMF, the question is rather clear.

Do you think its a good idea to hide behind a false facade pretending to be something you are not on a site that allows children. Tell the forum why you think thats a good idea?


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I already answered it honestly and point blank in the uneditted post you were responding to.
so please tell me again, do you think they are more or less likley to come forward because its not entirely clear in your answer.



Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Do you think its a good idea to hide behind a false facade pretending to be something you are not on a site that allows children. Tell the forum why you think thats a good idea?
What "false facade pretending to be something" are you talking about?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
that must mean something to someone somewhere I am sure, I am fine but your master seems to be having not a little difficulty, caught engaging in rank hypocrisy, of accusing people of values that they do not profess simply because he disagrees with their stance an action which he himself has publicly stated is not normal. Unable to answer even simple questions he is trying all kinds of tricks but none of them seem to be working for him, perhaps you can make it all better with a little kissy kissy.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so please tell me again, do you think they are more or less likley to come forward because its not entirely clear in your answer.
It's crystal clear, robbie. There are two sentences. It's the second sentence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Sure after my dinner and an episode of Space1999, its dinner and Sci-fi time for me. See if you can reel your friend in he seems not a little delirious.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
It's crystal clear, robbie. There are two sentences. It's the second sentence.
more or less FMF, just type more or less, that will suffice.