Go back
affect and effect

affect and effect

General

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
What "false facade pretending to be something" are you talking about?
Its not a difficult question FMF. I have even given you the answers, all you need to do is type . . . . .good idea, not a good idea.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not a difficult question FMF. I have even given you the answers, all you need to do is type . . . . .good idea, not a good idea.
The words "false facade pretending to be something" are your words, not mine. You said them. I didn't say them. What do you mean by them




Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Do you agree or disagree that a child abuser is more or less likely to come forward if they know that they will be reported due to mandatory reporting.
I believe that a child abuser is more likely to abuse children - and to abuse children again and again - and to resume his abuse of children - if he knows that the corporation he's a member of is going to keep it secret.

I think he's less likely to come forward and will just chance his arm, safe in the knowledge that the organization will keep it all confidential if he gets caught.


1 edit


-Removed-
@ divegeester

Support Robbie? You make him sound like a football club. Do you think i've been waving a scarf around with his name on it?

In this thread I have only supported the truth. Robbie called your initial post lame, something I thought was incorrect and duly pulled him up on. - It was then later claimed that Robbie had brought up the issue regarding FMF in this thread. I pointed out that FMF had actually brought up the issue himself. (Something you later accepted).

Nothing discussed since has dissuaded me from my position that resurrecting this topic served no purpose. Let sleeping dogs lie.


Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
It was then later claimed that Robbie had brought up the issue regarding FMF in this thread. I pointed out that FMF had actually brought up the issue himself.
What is "the issue" as you see it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
@ divegeester

Support Robbie? You make him sound like a football club. Do you think i've been waving a scarf around with his name on it?

In this thread I have only supported the truth. Robbie called your initial post lame, something I thought was incorrect and duly pulled him up on. - It was then later claimed that Robbie had brought up the is ...[text shortened]... uaded me from my position that resurrecting this topic served no purpose. Let sleeping dogs lie.
I support Ghost of a Duke.


Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
I support Ghost of a Duke.
Horray!

🙂


Originally posted by FMF
What is "the issue" as you see it?
The 'issues' as you laid them out. (Regarding past insinuations/comments you say Robbie made about you and later apologised for).

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The real issue is the difference between affect and effect.


-Removed-
Oh dear it was your friend once again that raised the issue of insinuations that were made against him, not me. It seems that he simply cannot let it go despite that fact that he has engaged in similar behaviour himself. Behaviour which he has publicly stated is abnormal. Look how he cannot answer a simple question because to do so will incriminate him. If I was him I would let sleeping dogs lie but it seems he simply cannot get enough.