Originally posted by scandiumSo, which cable network do you think is the most credible?
Funny... I thought the Iraqi News Network was setup and funded by the U.S. Government as a check on the Fox News channel should that unofficial propaganda arm ever get out of line and start reporting real news. 😉
On edit: I think I have whatever the "INN" is mixed up with the "news" channel setup by the Pentagon a few years ago to broadcast in Iraq.
...[text shortened]... it as entertainment... its kinds of to journalism what professional wrestling is to sports).
I like The Dog Whisperer on National Geographic.
GRANNY.
Originally posted by shavixmirDo you have a country?
If my country was occupied (and I disagreed with the occupation) I would be blowing them up.
I think, however, that you've answered your own question by saying what I've quoted.
Any job which means you have to pay for what "the State" should be paying for is obviously a job with dubious sides to it. Or not?
Originally posted by shavixmirIf someone invaded the US you'd be cheering them on and setting up an undergroud railroad for them. You think I'm stupid?
Well no. It's obviously hypothetical.
I mean the country I'm residing in at the time.
However, for arguments sake one could say: the US, Scotland, Holland, France, Israel or England.
Or Israel for that matter.
Originally posted by shavixmirAnd to quickly add to that.
Dude. I judge countries, nations and people by their actions. Not my sense of citizenship or my passport.
No. I most certainly wouldn't want the US invaded by anyone. That would mean a lot of innocent people being raped and murdered. End of story. That's what conquest is.
So excuse me from being appalled by it.
Originally posted by shavixmirIt seems to me you feel violence is acceptable on one's own soil against an invader but not in retaliation against that invader on the invader's soil.
And to quickly add to that.
No. I most certainly wouldn't want the US invaded by anyone. That would mean a lot of innocent people being raped and murdered. End of story. That's what conquest is.
So excuse me from being appalled by it.
If that's true you're being unrealistic. That does not work militarily. The Maginot Line is a good example of why. Lack of flexibility, and no need for the enemy to reserve forces for defense. You get hammered when the enemy feels like it and ignored when the enemy feels like it and cannot improve the situation.
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI believe you can defend yourself, yes.
It seems to me you feel violence is acceptable on one's own soil against an invader but not in retaliation against that invader on the invader's soil.
If that's true you're being unrealistic. That does not work militarily. The Maginot Line is a good example of why. Lack of flexibility, and no need for the enemy to reserve forces for defense.
I also believe that some invasional forces are okay. It depends on who's doing what, what the motives are and what's at stake.
Originally posted by smw6869When I watch cable news, which is rarely, its either CTV, CBC, or the BBC (the first two are Canadian). Sometimes I'm simply in the mood to be entertained though, and on those occasions I'll watch Fox. Plus then nobody can accuse me that my news source isn't "fair and balanced" 😉
So, which cable network do you think is the most credible?
I like The Dog Whisperer on National Geographic.
GRANNY.
Mostly I prefer print sources (but online) and there I tend to bounce around a bit as I like to get the international perspective from different nations.
Originally posted by shavixmirWhy don't you run for office then in some Republic? You could actually become someone who's the judge of it all. That is, with the consent of the people.
And I'll be the judge of it all.
And more often than not... an invading force doesn't have much of a foot to stand on.
I hope you don't want to decide for the people against their wishes!
Originally posted by shavixmirYou mean like, oh, I dunno - WWII?
I believe you can defend yourself, yes.
I also believe that some invasional forces are okay. It depends on who's doing what, what the motives are and what's at stake.
It also helps to have a good endgame before you go into battle like, oh, I dunno - the Marshall Plan?
It appears to me that there are a lot of opinions being thrown about here with little supporting evidence. I like the smell of opinions in the morning - smells like...