Am i the only one to notice "connections" between the posted "question" and the reply "answer".
(see thread: http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=18932&page=11)
for example:
Q: what gets you 'in the mood'?
A: either the kitchen table or the office photocopier.
I still think we should analyse it. I went and bought a note book and a new pen specially and now I'm going to make some notes for a bit.
Post.1.by.dfm65.
Analysis of poster: appears deranged, possibly into playing chess., definitely of the male sex.
Analysis of post: Elipsis at the end of first sentence betrays fondness for pornography. Frequent abuse of pornography becomes evident with reference to Buddhist Monks (i.e. trying to change the subject.)
Conclusion: Regular medication and more green vegetables. No more coffee, ever.
Post.2.by.Starrman.
Analysis of poster: appears deranged, possibly into science fiction, definitely has enormous porn collection.
Analysis of post: Post does not comply with reality. 1 edit: obviously addicted to paracetamol. Spelt Christmas with a small c, very interesting. Further analysis required, God willing.
Conclusion: This brave young man will go on to be a pioneering adventurer one day, inventing great theories about women's mood shifts. He will have seven children and die ugly.
Further analysis to follow if I could be bothered. This is getting boring. Ooh... look a window. Never noticed that before.
Originally posted by hopscotchMan, this guy is good!
Post.1.by.dfm65.
Analysis of poster: appears deranged, possibly into playing chess., definitely of the male sex.
Analysis of post: Elipsis at the end of first sentence betrays fondness for pornography. Frequent abuse of pornography becomes evident with reference to Buddhist Monks (i.e. trying to change the subject.)
Conclusion: Regular medication and more green vegetables. No more coffee, ever.
Originally posted by AlcraI think I may have misworded the post, thereby causing confusion. Let me try again.
Am i the only one to notice "connections" between the posted "question" and the reply "answer".
(see thread: http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=18932&page=11)
for example:
Q: what gets you 'in the mood'?
A: either the kitchen table or the office photocopier.
Imagine a post in the question thread. This post contains a question to the previous post and an answer for the next post. Now, the question must relate to the previous post's answer - this we know.
The answer leads the following poster to form a question. HOWEVER, within that *one* post, the question and the answer need not form a relationship.
Now, they often do - thereby allowing the thread to become a sort of word-association thread.
What can be read into the mind of the poster, based on his thought processes of first coming up with a question and then a (non-related) answer?
Originally posted by hopscotchLOL!
I still think we should analyse it. I went and bought a note book and a new pen specially and now I'm going to make some notes for a bit.
Post.1.by.dfm65.
Analysis of poster: appears deranged, possibly into playing chess., definitely of the male sex.
Analysis of post: Elipsis at the end of first sentence betrays fondness for pornography. Frequent ab ...[text shortened]... if I could be bothered. This is getting boring. Ooh... look a window. Never noticed that before.
Originally posted by CrowleyNo worries Werner, I'm fully aware that you need to belittle others whilst hiding your true fetid visage behind the flimsy mask of your avatar tag 😛
Well, no analysis needed, just look at his pic...
....
Sorry Liam, couldn't resist 😛
Originally posted by Alcrayes. i, for one, usually try to make the Q and A within the one post relevant to each other. As Starrman pointed out, the better posts in the thread generally do this.
I think I may have misworded the post, thereby causing confusion. Let me try again.
Imagine a post in the question thread. This post contains a question to the previous post and an answer for the next post. Now, the question must relate to the previous post's answer - this we know.
The answer leads the following poster to form a question. HOWEVER, within ...[text shortened]... d on his thought processes of first coming up with a question and then a (non-related) answer?