@gareth-cobbsaid Royalty is outdated.The idea that you are a king just by birthright does not make sense.And to rub salt into it the queen been the richest woman in the world and the head of a christian church is the height of hypocrisy.If you want proof the bible says it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than enter the kingdom of God.The king of kings in christianity was not rich.
The Queen is not the richest woman in the world. Not even close.
@gareth-cobbsaid Royalty is outdated.The idea that you are a king just by birthright does not make sense.And to rub salt into it the queen been the richest woman in the world and the head of a christian church is the height of hypocrisy.If you want proof the bible says it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than enter the kingdom of God.The king of kings in christianity was not rich.
The Queen voluntarily turns over the revenue from her property to the British government. Just that sum is many, many times more than they cost, not to mention tourism. If you abolish the monarchy, it's still her land. You lose that revenue.
@ashiitakasaid The Queen voluntarily turns over the revenue from her property to the British government. Just that sum is many, many times more than they cost, not to mention tourism. If you abolish the monarchy, it's still her land. You lose that revenue.
Are you sure?
I think she hands over revenue from Royal assets ... not her personal portfolio.