@gareth-cobb saidThe Queen is not the richest woman in the world. Not even close.
Royalty is outdated.The idea that you are a king just by birthright does not make sense.And to rub salt into it the queen been the richest woman in the world and the head of a christian church is the height of hypocrisy.If you want proof the bible says it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than enter the kingdom of God.The king of kings in christianity was not rich.
@gareth-cobb saidThe Queen voluntarily turns over the revenue from her property to the British government. Just that sum is many, many times more than they cost, not to mention tourism. If you abolish the monarchy, it's still her land. You lose that revenue.
Royalty is outdated.The idea that you are a king just by birthright does not make sense.And to rub salt into it the queen been the richest woman in the world and the head of a christian church is the height of hypocrisy.If you want proof the bible says it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than enter the kingdom of God.The king of kings in christianity was not rich.
@gareth-cobb saidHave you spent your morning sir Googling the Queen?
and another 10 billion in assets like art and jewels makes her pretty close if not richest.
@gareth-cobb saidIt is a carefully guarded secret here at RHP that the Ghost receives a monthly subsidy from the Queen of 7000 groats and 3 jars of pickled walnuts.
I checked if she hadn't given it all away after hearing she wasn't the richest g.o.a.d
God bless her.
@ashiitaka saidAre you sure?
The Queen voluntarily turns over the revenue from her property to the British government. Just that sum is many, many times more than they cost, not to mention tourism. If you abolish the monarchy, it's still her land. You lose that revenue.
I think she hands over revenue from Royal assets ... not her personal portfolio.