1 edit
Originally posted by wormwoodThey will move the thread for you. I really think this is not what synethesia is all about, I tried only 10 out of 20 test questions but 100 percent accuracy. Those symbols are only little more than a mere alternative notation, shapes follow the pitch direction, or the form of musical frase(s).
it's time for yet another scientifically 100% accurate and conclusive internet test:
http://jakemandell.com/amvi/
Total Score: 85%
edit: oops, wrong forum, alert in progress...
However, "seeing" music or feeling the shape of it is indeed possible and natural.
Originally posted by wormwoodI didn't get it at first, so I got a bunch wrong in the beginning.
it's time for yet another scientifically 100% accurate and conclusive internet test:
http://jakemandell.com/amvi/
Total Score: 85%
edit: oops, wrong forum, alert in progress...
Total Score: 75%
Pitch discrimination: 76.8%
Musical memory: 74.5%
Contour discrimination: 90.4%
Attention: 74.2%
Musical/visual abstraction: 55.9%
Originally posted by ivan2908I have to agree, it seems as though real synaesthesia actually involves differing visual perceptions for different pitches, timbres, etc. This is just a different one-to-one mapping between instruments and melody, etc. Being able to translate one modality into another does not bear any relation to synaesthesia,
They will move the thread for you. I really think this is not what synethesia is all about, I tried only 10 out of 20 test questions but 100 percent accuracy. Those symbols are only little more than a mere alternative notation, shapes follow the pitch direction, or the form of musical frase(s).
However, "seeing" music or feeling the shape of it is indeed possible and natural.
Joe